Quantifying flexibility in thought: The resiliency of semantic networks differs across the lifespan

被引:55
作者
Cosgrove, Abigail L. [1 ]
Kenett, Yoed N. [2 ]
Beaty, Roger E. [1 ]
Diaz, Michele T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, 356 Moore Bldg, University Pk, PA 16801 USA
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Haifa, Israel
关键词
Semantic networks; Percolation; Aging; Cognition; Verbal fluency; WORD-ASSOCIATION; VERBAL FLUENCY; OLDER-ADULTS; MEMORY; MODELS; YOUNG; REPRESENTATION; VOCABULARY; BOOTSTRAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104631
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Older adults tend to have a broader vocabulary compared to younger adults ? indicating a richer storage of semantic knowledge ? but their retrieval abilities decline with age. Recent advances in quantitative methods based on network science have investigated the effect of aging on semantic memory structure. However, it is yet to be determined how this aging effect on semantic memory structure relates to its overall flexibility. Percolation analysis provides a quantitative measure of the flexibility of a semantic network, by examining how a semantic memory network is resistant to ?attacks? or breaking apart. In this study, we incorporated percolation analyses to examine how semantic networks of younger and older adults break apart to investigate potential age-related differences in language production. We applied the percolation analysis to 3 independent sets of data (total N = 78 younger, 78 older adults) from which we generated semantic networks based on verbal fluency performance. Across all 3 datasets, the percolation integrals of the younger adults were larger than older adults, indicating that older adults? semantic networks were less flexible and broke down faster than the younger adults?. Our findings provide quantitative evidence for diminished flexibility in older adults? semantic networks, despite the stability of semantic knowledge across the lifespan. This may be one contributing factor to age-related differences in language production.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Random Walks on Semantic Networks Can Resemble Optimal Foraging [J].
Abbott, Joshua T. ;
Austerweil, Joseph L. ;
Griffiths, Thomas L. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 122 (03) :558-569
[2]   Cognitive testing toward the future:: The example of Semantic Verbal Fluency (ANIMALS) [J].
Ardila, Alfredo ;
Ostrosky-Solis, Feggy ;
Bernal, Byron .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 41 (05) :324-332
[3]   Networks in Cognitive Science [J].
Baronchelli, Andrea ;
Ferrer-i-Cancho, Ramon ;
Pastor-Satorras, Romualdo ;
Chater, Nick ;
Christiansen, Morten H. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (07) :348-360
[4]   How semantic memory structure and intelligence contribute to creative thought: a network science approach [J].
Benedek, Mathias ;
Kenett, Yoed N. ;
Umdasch, Konstantin ;
Anaki, David ;
Faust, Miriam ;
Neubauer, Aljoscha C. .
THINKING & REASONING, 2017, 23 (02) :158-183
[5]  
Bernard M., 2019, 41 ANN M COGN SCI SO
[6]   Second-order properties of an extrapolated bootstrap without replacement under weak assumptions [J].
Bertail, P .
BERNOULLI, 1997, 3 (02) :149-179
[7]   Modeling Abnormal Priming in Alzheimer's Patients with a Free Association Network [J].
Borge-Holthoefer, Javier ;
Moreno, Yamir ;
Arenas, Alex .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (08)
[8]   Semantic Networks: Structure and Dynamics [J].
Borge-Holthoefer, Javier ;
Arenas, Alex .
ENTROPY, 2010, 12 (05) :1264-1302
[9]   When pumpkin is closer to onion than to squash: The structure of the second language lexicon [J].
Borodkin, Katy ;
Kenett, Yoed N. ;
Faust, Miriam ;
Mashal, Nira .
COGNITION, 2016, 156 :60-70
[10]  
BOUSFIELD WA, 1958, PSYCHOL REP, V4, P39