Sweet potato production efficiency in Nigeria: Application of data envelopment analysis

被引:7
作者
Adeyonu, Abigail Gbemisola [1 ]
Balogun, Olubunmi Lawrence [2 ]
Ajiboye, Babatunde Oluseyi [1 ]
Oluwatayo, Isaac Busayo [3 ]
Otunaiya, Abiodun Olanrewaju [4 ]
机构
[1] Landmark Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Extens, Omu Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria
[2] Babcock Univ, Sch Sci & Technol, Dept Agr & Ind Technol, Ilishan, Ogun State, Nigeria
[3] Univ Limpopo, Dept Agr Econ & Anim Prod, ZA-0727 Sovenga, South Africa
[4] Olabisi Onabanjo Univ, Coll Agr Sci, Dept Agr Econ & Farm Management, Yewa Campus, Ayetoro, Ogun State, Nigeria
关键词
efficiency; sweet potato farms; production constraints; DEA; Nigeria; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC-EFFICIENCY; FARMS;
D O I
10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.672
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This study examined Sweet Potato (SwP) production efficiency in Nigeria. A multi-stage sampling technique was employed in selecting 93 SwP farms in February, 2016. Data on farm and farmers' characteristics, input and output quantities and prices, constraints to SwP production among others were collected using pre-tested, well-structured questionnaire. The data were analysed with descriptive statistics, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Tobit regression. The results of the analysis revealed that the mean Technical Efficiency (TE), Allocative Efficiency (AE), Economic Efficiency (EE) under Constant Return to Scale (CRS) assumption were 0.685, 0.445 and 0.301 respectively. On the other hand, the TE, AE and EE under Variable Return to Scale (VRS) assumption were 0.783, 0.604 and 0.467 respectively. The Scale Efficiency (SE) was found to be 0.877. The results indicate that access to credit increased TE of farms by 3.5%. Regular training of SwP farmers increased their AE by 10.5% and EE by 16.6%. Access to credit by farmers decreased SE of farms under CRS and VRS by 1.9% respectively. Labour shortage, poor access to improved technology and infestation by insect pests were the three most important constraints limiting SwP production in the study area. Therefore, improving the efficiency of SwP production will require policies that will see to regular training of farmers by extension agents and other stakeholders and enhancement of rural farmers' access to credit.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 684
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Adeyonu A. G., 2016, Agro-Science, V15, P17
[2]  
Agbo I, 1992, P WORKSH HELD DOVL C
[3]  
Aigner D., 1977, Journal of Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-4076, 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[4]  
Al-Feel M. A., 2012, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, V11, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jssas.2011.08.001
[5]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[6]   Technical, allocative and economic efficiency of commercial poultry farms in Bangladesh [J].
Begum, I. A. ;
Buysse, J. ;
Alam, M. J. ;
Van Huylenbroeck, G. .
WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2010, 66 (03) :465-475
[7]   Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) genotypes [J].
Caliskan, Mehmet Emin ;
Erturk, Elif ;
Sogut, Tahsin ;
Boydak, Erkan ;
Arioglu, Halis .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2007, 35 (01) :87-99
[8]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[9]  
CHAVAS JP, 1993, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V18, P1
[10]  
Coelli Tim., 1996, CREPP WP, 96/05, University of Liege