Walking while talking: Effect of task prioritization in the elderly

被引:185
作者
Verghese, Joe
Kuslansky, Gail
Holtzer, Roee
Katz, Mindy
Xue, Xiaonan
Buschke, Herman
Pahor, Marco
机构
[1] Yeshiva Univ Albert Einstein Coll Med, Einstein Aging Study, Dept Neurol, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] Yeshiva Univ Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[3] Yeshiva Univ Albert Einstein Coll Med, Ferkauf Grad Sch Psychol, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Aging & Geriatr Res, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2007年 / 88卷 / 01期
关键词
attention; elderly; rehabilitation; walking;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.007
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the effect of 2 instructions on the same walking while talking (WWT) task on task prioritization by nondisabled subjects. Design: Cross-sectional survey with within subject comparisons. Setting: Community-based sample. Participants: Older adults (N=189; mean age, 80.2 +/- 4.9y), who did not meet criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition, for dementia and were able to independently perform activities of daily living. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Verbal and gait measures on the same WWT task with 2 different instructions: paying attention to both talking and walking (WWT-C) and paying attention only to talking (WWT-T). Results: Task prioritization effects were seen on walking but not on talking. Compared with their baseline normal walking velocity (without talking), subjects slowed down more on WWT-T (median change, 28.3%) than WWT-C (median change, 26.4%). Comparing the 2 WWT conditions, velocity and cadence was slower during WWT-T compared with WWT-C, with longer stride length. Verbal output was not significantly different on the 2 conditions. Conclusions: Changing instructions while maintaining the same cognitive and motor tasks on WWT in older adults result in task prioritization effects.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 53
页数:4
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, AM PSYCHIATR ASSOC
[2]  
Beauchet O, 2005, J MOTOR BEHAV, V37, P259
[3]   Concurrent related validity of the GAITRite® walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait [J].
Bilney, B ;
Morris, M ;
Webster, K .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2003, 17 (01) :68-74
[4]   ASSOCIATION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE MEASURES OF DEMENTIA AND OF SENILE CHANGE IN CEREBRAL GREY MATTER OF ELDERLY SUBJECTS [J].
BLESSED, G ;
TOMLINSON, BE ;
ROTH, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1968, 114 (512) :797-+
[5]   Walking and talking as predictors of falls in the general population: The Leiden 85-Plus Study [J].
Bootsma-van der Wiel, A ;
Gussekloo, J ;
de Craen, AJM ;
van Exel, E ;
Bloem, BR ;
Westendorp, RGJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2003, 51 (10) :1466-1471
[6]   SELECTIVE REMINDING FOR ANALYSIS OF MEMORY AND LEARNING [J].
BUSCHKE, H .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1973, 12 (05) :543-550
[7]   Talking while walking: The effect of a dual task in aging and Alzheimer's disease [J].
Camicioli, R ;
Howieson, D ;
Lehman, S ;
Kaye, J .
NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (04) :955-958
[8]   Quantitative assessment of the stops walking while talking test in the elderly [J].
de Hoon, EW ;
Allum, JH ;
Carpenter, MG ;
Salis, C ;
Bloem, BR ;
Conzelmann, M ;
Bischoff, HA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (06) :838-842
[9]  
Gill TM, 2003, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V58, P70
[10]  
GLANZ SA, 1997, PRIMER BIO STAT