Timing of staples and dressing removal after cesarean delivery (the SCARR study)

被引:2
作者
Heinemann, Netanella [1 ]
Solnica, Amy [1 ]
Abdelkader, Rana [1 ]
Gutman, Jakov [1 ]
Nalbandian, Noemzar [2 ]
Raizman, Ela [2 ]
Hochner-Celnikier, Drorith [1 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Hebrew Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hadassah Hebrew Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Nursing Adm, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
BMI; Cesarean delivery; Dressing; Healing; PPROM; Risk factors; Staples; Urgent caesarean delivery; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; CLOSURE; SKIN; PREVENTION; SECTION;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.12757
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate optimal timing of dressing and staples removal after cesarean delivery (CD). Methods This prospective clustered clinical trial enrolled women undergoing CD between January 1, 2013, and October 31, 2014, at Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem. Women were assigned to one of five clusters differing in timing of dressing and staples removal. We assessed scar healing at 6 weeks. Results 920 women completed telephone questionnaires. Wound healing did not differ significantly among the clusters: the healing complication rate was 21% in the control group (n=46) and ranged from 18% to 26% (n=27-50) in clusters two to five (P=0.49). More healing complications were observed in women with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 35 kg/m(2) versus 35 kg/m(2) or less (P=0.016), urgent versus elective CD (P=0.013), preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) versus intact membranes (P=0.016), and chorioamnionitis at delivery versus no chorioamnionitis (P=0.001). 586 (64%) women underwent physician assessment at staples removal and at 6 weeks post CD. Conclusions Timing of dressing and staples removal has no effect on CD scar healing in low- and high-risk parturients. A BMI of more than 35 kg/m(2), urgent CD, PPROM, and chorioamnionitis were associated with mal-healing, regardless of cluster. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01724255.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Allegranzi Benedetta, 2016, Lancet Infect Dis, V16, pe288, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30402-9
[2]  
Barbul A, 2015, SCHWARTZS PRINCIPLES, P241
[3]   Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery [J].
Basha, Suzanne L. ;
Rochon, Meredith L. ;
Quinones, Joanne N. ;
Coassolo, Kara M. ;
Rust, Orion A. ;
Smulian, John C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (03) :285.e1-285.e8
[4]   Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery [J].
Berghella, V ;
Baxter, JK ;
Chauhan, SP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (05) :1607-1617
[5]  
Berghella V, 2018, CESAREAN DELIVERY PO
[6]   Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial [J].
Cromi, Antonella ;
Ghezzi, Fabio ;
Gottardi, Alessandra ;
Cherubino, Mario ;
Uccella, Stefano ;
Valdatta, Luigi .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (01) :36.e1-36.e8
[7]   Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection [J].
Dumville, Jo C. ;
Gray, Trish A. ;
Walter, Catherine J. ;
Sharp, Catherine A. ;
Page, Tamara ;
Macefield, Rhiannon ;
Blencowe, Natalie ;
Milne, Thomas K. G. ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Blazeby, Jane .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (12)
[8]  
Figueroa D, 2013, OBSTET GYNECOL, V121, P33, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827a072c, http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827a072c]
[9]   Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure [J].
Fleisher, Jonah ;
Khalifeh, Adeeb ;
Pettker, Christian ;
Berghella, Vincenzo ;
Dabbish, Nooreen ;
Mackeen, A. Dhanya .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (22) :3830-3835
[10]  
Frishman GN, 1997, J REPROD MED, V42, P627