Biomechanical comparison of human pulmonary and aortic roots

被引:48
作者
Azadani, Ali N.
Chitsaz, Sam
Matthews, Peter B.
Jaussaud, Nicolas
Leung, James
Wisneski, Andrew
Ge, Liang
Tseng, Elaine E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Med Ctr, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Biomechanics; Aortic root; Pulmonary root; Ross operation; Stress; Strain; PORCINE PULMONARY; ASCENDING AORTA; VALVE;
D O I
10.1093/ejcts/ezr163
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Significant dilation of the pulmonary autograft is problematic after the Ross operation and may require reoperation. Pulmonary autograft remodelling occurs in response to the immediate rise in pressure and consequently wall stress. Stress-strain response of the pulmonary root plays an important role in understanding autograft function and remodelling following the Ross procedure. However, limited data are available on mechanical properties of fresh human pulmonary roots. The aim of this study was to compare mechanical properties of fresh human pulmonary and aortic roots prior to the Ross operation. Fresh healthy human hearts (n = 21) were obtained from California Transplant Donor Network (Oakland, CA, USA). Five regions of pulmonary and aortic roots, anterior and posterior artery and three sinuses, were subjected to displacement-controlled equibiaxial stretch testing within 24 h of cross-clamp time. Different regions of pulmonary and aortic roots were compared using a paired-comparison approach based on tissue stiffness at systemic pressure. Furthermore, histologic analysis was performed to compare the fibrous structure of pulmonary and aortic roots. Human pulmonary and aortic roots demonstrated nonlinear response to biaxial loading in both circumferential and longitudinal directions. Pulmonary artery was found to be significantly stiffer than ascending aorta at systemic pressure in the two principal directions (P < 0.001). Similarly, pulmonary sinuses were significantly stiffer than the aortic sinuses at systemic pressure in the two directions (P < 0.001). Histological analysis revealed that aortic roots had tight denser weave of elastin than pulmonary roots. Significant differences were found in the compliance and fibrous structure of human pulmonary and aortic roots. These regional differences may impact pulmonary autograft remodelling and influence late autograft dilation.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1116
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Carr-White GS, 2000, CIRCULATION, V102, P15
[2]   Long-term results of aortic valve-sparing operations for aortic root aneurysm [J].
David, Tirone E. ;
Feindel, Christopher M. ;
Webb, Gary D. ;
Colman, Jack M. ;
Armstrong, Susan ;
Maganti, Manjula .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 132 (02) :347-353
[3]   Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis - The good, the bad, and the ugly [J].
Galis, ZS ;
Khatri, JJ .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2002, 90 (03) :251-262
[4]  
GIBBONS GH, 1994, NEW ENGL J MED, V330, P1431
[5]  
Gundiah N, 2008, J HEART VALVE DIS, V17, P606
[6]   Significant differences in the material properties between aged human and porcine aortic tissues [J].
Martin, Caitlin ;
Thuy Pham ;
Sun, Wei .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 40 (01) :28-34
[7]   Comparison of Porcine Pulmonary and Aortic Root Material Properties [J].
Matthews, Peter B. ;
Azadani, Ali N. ;
Jhun, Choon-Sik ;
Ge, Liang ;
Guy, T. Sloane ;
Guccione, Julius M. ;
Tseng, Elaine E. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 89 (06) :1981-1989
[8]   The in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics of the porcine pulmonary valve and root with regard to the Ross procedure [J].
Nagy, ZL ;
Fisher, J ;
Walker, PG ;
Watterson, KG .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 120 (02) :284-289
[9]   Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessment using a new mathematical model [J].
Raghavan, ML ;
Webster, MW ;
Vorp, DA .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 24 (05) :573-582
[10]   A method for planar biaxial mechanical testing that includes in-plane shear [J].
Sacks, MS .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1999, 121 (05) :551-555