Is there a role for diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the diagnosis of central cartilage tumors?

被引:58
作者
Douis, H. [1 ,2 ]
Jeys, L. [3 ]
Grimer, R. [3 ]
Vaiyapuri, S. [4 ]
Davies, A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Radiol, Birmingham B31 2AP, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Royal Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Oncol, Birmingham B31 2AP, W Midlands, England
[4] Royal Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Musculoskeletal Pathol, Birmingham B31 2AP, W Midlands, England
关键词
Enchondroma; Chondrosarcoma; Diffusion-weighted MRI; MR imaging; LOW-GRADE; CHONDROSARCOMA; BONE; ENCHONDROMAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00256-015-2123-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To assess if diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) can differentiate between central enchondromas and chondrosarcomas (CS) and if DWI can distinguish low-grade chondroid lesions from high-grade CS. Fifty-two patients with central cartilage tumors were included. Patients underwent conventional MRI and DWI with ADC mapping. The slice on MRI with the most aggressive imaging feature was identified. The corresponding mean and minimum ADC maps of the tumor at this position were measured. There were 24 enchondromas, five atypical cartilaginous lesions, 15 grade 1, three grade 2, two grade 3, and three dedifferentiated CS. Mean ADC values (x10(-6) mm(2)/s) for enchondromas, atypical cartilaginous tumors, grade 1 CS, grade 2, CS, grade 3 CS and dedifferentiated CS were 1,896, 2,048, 2,152, 2,170, 2,076, and 1,261, respectively. Minimum ADC values (x10(-6) mm(2)/s) for enchondromas, atypical cartilaginous tumors, grade 1 CS, grade 2, CS, grade 3 CS and dedifferentiated CS were 1,820, 1,752, 2,010, 1,829, 1,752, and 767, respectively. ANOVA test demonstrated a statistically significant difference in mean and minimum ADC values in all groups. Post hoc analysis revealed this was due to difference in mean and minimum ADC values in dedifferentiated CS. The mean ADC value in low-grade chondroid lesions was 2,001, while the ADC value for high-grade CS were 2,132. The minimum ADC value for low-grade chondroid lesions was 1,896, while the minimum ADC for high-grade CS was 1,837. The difference in minimum and mean ADC values was not statistically significant. DWI cannot differentiate between enchondromas and CS and DWI does not aid in the distinction of low-grade chondroid tumors from high-grade CS.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 969
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Surgical Treatment of Grade I Central Chondrosarcoma [J].
Donati, Davide ;
Colangeli, Simone ;
Colangeli, Marco ;
Di Bella, Claudia ;
Bertoni, Franco .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (02) :581-589
[2]   The imaging of cartilaginous bone tumours. II. Chondrosarcoma [J].
Douis, H. ;
Saifuddin, A. .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (05) :611-626
[3]   MRI differentiation of low-grade from high-grade appendicular chondrosarcoma [J].
Douis, Hassan ;
Singh, Leanne ;
Saifuddin, Asif .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) :232-240
[4]   Assessment of Interobserver Variability and Histologic Parameters to Improve Reliability in Classification and Grading of Central Cartilaginous Tumors [J].
Eefting, Daniel ;
Schrage, Yvonne M. ;
Geirnaerdt, Maartje J. A. ;
Le Cessie, Saskia ;
Taminiau, Anthonie H. M. ;
Bovee, Judith V. M. G. ;
Hogendoorn, Pancras C. W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 33 (01) :50-57
[5]   Chondrosarcoma of bone [J].
Grimer, RJ ;
Carter, SR ;
Tillman, RM ;
Mangham, DC ;
Abudu, A ;
Fiorenza, F .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (08) :1203-1203
[6]   Outcome of intralesional curettage for low-grade chondrosarcoma of long bones [J].
Hanna, S. A. ;
Whittingham-Jones, P. ;
Sewell, M. D. ;
Pollock, R. C. ;
Skinner, J. A. ;
Saifuddin, A. ;
Flanagan, A. ;
Cannon, S. R. ;
Briggs, T. W. R. .
EJSO, 2009, 35 (12) :1343-1347
[7]   Evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differential diagnosis of poorly contrast-enhanced and T2-prolonged bone masses: Initial experience [J].
Hayashida, Y ;
Hirai, T ;
Yakushiji, T ;
Katahira, K ;
Shimomura, O ;
Imuta, M ;
Nakaura, T ;
Utsunomiya, D ;
Awai, K ;
Yamashita, Y .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 23 (03) :377-382
[8]  
Hogendoorn P.C.W., 2013, WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, V4th ed., P264
[9]   Prevalence of shoulder enchondromas on routine MR imaging [J].
Hong, Edmund D. ;
Carrino, John A. ;
Weber, Kristy L. ;
Fayad, Laura M. .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2011, 35 (05) :378-384
[10]  
INWARDS C, 2013, WHO CLASSIFICATION T, P269