Determinants of false positive recall in an Australian mammographic screening program

被引:3
作者
Kavanagh, A. M. [1 ]
Davidson, N.
Jolley, D. [3 ]
Heuzenroeder, L.
Chapman, A.
Evans, J. [4 ]
Gertig, D. M. [5 ]
Amos, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Key Ctr Womens Hlth Soc, Sch Populat Hlth, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] BreastScreen Victoria, Policy & Evaluat, Carton S 3053, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Geelong, Vic 3217, Australia
[4] Monash BreastScreen, E Bentleigh, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Genet Epidemiol, Sch Populat Hlth, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
关键词
screening; mammography; false positive; recall rates;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2005.09.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We conducted a case-controt study (n = 30128) to assess the importance of clinical (e.g., family history, age, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use and duration) and service-related characteristics (e.g., time since introduction of Kodak MINR2000 film, year of screen) for false positive (FP) recall at BreastScreen Victoria, Australia. There was an age-adjusted upward trend in FP recall rates with year of screen at first (odds ratio (OR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.08-1.13) and subsequent rounds (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06). In the multivariate analysis, the upward trend only remained for first round and age and family history also remained statistically significant at first round. At subsequent rounds the time since introduction of MINR2000, age, strong family history of breast cancer, use of HRT, recall at previous screen and previous screen at more than 27 months were all important predictors of FP recall. The rise in FP rates with year of screen at first round screening is of concern and may require further training of radiologists to improve confidence when viewing films when there a no films for comparison. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 518
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms - Clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits [J].
Barton, MB ;
Moore, S ;
Polk, S ;
Shtatland, E ;
Elmore, JG ;
Fletcher, SW .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 16 (03) :150-156
[2]   EPIDEMIOLOGIC DETERMINANTS OF THE MAMMOGRAPHIC PARENCHYMAL PATTERN - A POPULATION-BASED STUDY WITHIN A MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING-PROGRAM [J].
BERGKVIST, L ;
TABAR, L ;
BERGSTROM, R ;
ADAMI, HO .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 126 (06) :1075-1081
[3]  
BOONE J, 1999, ADV HIGH SPEED MAMMO
[4]  
*BREASTSCREEN VICT, 1997, ANN STAT REP 1995
[5]  
*BREASTSCREEN VICT, 2000, ANN STAT REP 1998
[6]  
*BREASTSCREEN VICT, 1999, ANN STAT REP 1997
[7]  
*BREASTSCREEN VICT, 2001, ANN STAT REP 1999
[8]  
*BREASTSCREEN VICT, 1998, ANN STAT REP 1996
[9]   Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment [J].
Brett, J ;
Austoker, J ;
Ong, G .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1998, 20 (04) :396-403
[10]   Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance [J].
Brett, J ;
Austoker, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 2001, 23 (04) :292-300