Cost-Utility Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone as a First-Line Treatment for Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China

被引:8
作者
Chen, Ting [1 ]
Xie, Ruixiang [1 ]
Zhao, Qiuling [1 ]
Cai, Hongfu [2 ]
Yang, Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ Canc Hosp, Fujian Canc Hosp, Dept Pharm, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ Union Hosp, Dept Pharm, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
nonsquamous NSCLC; camrelizumab; chemotherapy; first-line treatment; cost-utility analysis; PEMBROLIZUMAB; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.746526
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the cost utility of camrelizumab plus standard chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the perspective of the Chinese health care system and to provide a reference for health decision-making. MethodsA Markov model consisting of three health states was designed to evaluate the cost utility of these two treatment regimens for NSCLC patients with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as the primary output indicator. Clinical data were derived from a published phase III clinical trial (CameL; ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03134872). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the model uncertainty. ResultsBase case analysis showed that the ICER of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone was $43,275.43 per QALY. It was higher than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $31,510.57 per QALY in China, which has a standard of three times the GDP per capita recommended by the WHO. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the utility value of PFS had the greatest influence on the results, and the other sensitive parameters were the cost of subsequent second-line therapy in the two group, the pemetrexed price, the cost of adverse event management and the utility value of PD. The probability sensitivity analysis showed that the probabilities of the cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus standard chemotherapy were 27.1%, 66.7% and 88.0% when the WTP values were $40,000, $50,000 and $60,000 per QALY, respectively. ConclusionsTaking three times the GDP per capita in China as the WTP threshold, the camrelizumab plus standard chemotherapy regimen does not have a cost-effectiveness advantage compared with the standard chemotherapy regimen alone as a first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Report on nutrition and chronic diseases in China
[2]  
[Anonymous], WINNING PRICE DRUGS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Statistical Communique of the People's Republic of China on the 2015 National Economic and Social Development
[4]   Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Aziz, Mohamed Ismail Abdul ;
Tan, Ling Eng ;
Tan, Wan Hui Gloria ;
Toh, Chee-Keong ;
Loke, Lydia Pui Yee ;
Pearce, Fiona ;
Ng, Kwong .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (09) :952-960
[5]   Cost-effectiveness of Osimertinib as First-line Treatment and Sequential Therapy for EGFR Mutation-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in China [J].
Cai, Hongfu ;
Zhang, Longfeng ;
Li, Na ;
Chen, Shen ;
Zheng, Bin ;
Yang, Jing ;
Weng, Lizhu ;
Liu, Mao-Bai .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 41 (02) :280-290
[6]   Cost effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review [J].
Ding, Haiying ;
Xin, Wenxiu ;
Tong, Yinghui ;
Sun, Jiao ;
Xu, Gaoqi ;
Ye, Ziqi ;
Rao, Yuefeng .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09)
[7]   Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 1.2020 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines [J].
Ettinger, David S. ;
Wood, Douglas E. ;
Aggarwal, Charu ;
Aisner, Dara L. ;
Akerley, Wallace ;
Bauman, Jessica R. ;
Bharat, Ankit ;
Bruno, Debora S. ;
Chang, Joe Y. ;
Chirieac, Lucian R. ;
D'Amico, Thomas A. ;
Dilling, Thomas J. ;
Dobelbower, Michael ;
Gettinger, Scott ;
Govindan, Ramaswamy ;
Gubens, Matthew A. ;
Hennon, Mark ;
Horn, Leora ;
Lackner, Rudy P. ;
Lanuti, Michael ;
Leal, Ticiana A. ;
Lin, Jules ;
Loo, Billy W., Jr. ;
Martins, Renato G. ;
Otterson, Gregory A. ;
Patel, Sandip P. ;
Reckamp, Karen L. ;
Riely, Gregory J. ;
Schild, Steven E. ;
Shapiro, Theresa A. ;
Stevenson, James ;
Swanson, Scott J. ;
Tauer, Kurt W. ;
Yang, Stephen C. ;
Gregory, Kristina ;
Hughes, Miranda .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2019, 17 (12) :1464-1472
[8]   Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Georgieva, Mina ;
da Silveira Nogueira Lima, Joao P. ;
Aguiar, Pedro ;
Lopes, Gilberto de Lima, Jr. ;
Haaland, Benjamin .
LUNG CANCER, 2018, 124 :248-254
[9]  
He J, 2021, Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, V43, P243, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210119-00060
[10]   Economic Evaluations of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review [J].
Li, Na ;
Zheng, Huanrui ;
Zheng, Bin ;
Chen, Chaoxin ;
Cai, Hongfu ;
Liu, Maobai .
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 :4503-4518