The impact of treatment accuracy on proton therapy patient selection for oropharyngeal cancer patients

被引:24
作者
Arts, Tine [1 ]
Breedveld, Sebastiaan [1 ]
de Jong, Martin A. [2 ]
Astreinidou, Eleftheria [2 ]
Tans, Lisa [1 ]
Keskin-Cambay, Fatma [1 ]
Krol, Augustinus D. G. [2 ]
van de Water, Steven [1 ]
Bijman, Rik G. [1 ]
Hoogeman, Mischa S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, POB 5201, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] LUMC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Proton therapy; Head and neck cancer; Oropharyngeal cancer; IMRT; IMPT; Robust optimization; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; COMPLICATION PROBABILITY; NECK-CANCER; SETUP UNCERTAINTIES; SALIVARY-GLANDS; HEAD; OPTIMIZATION; ROBUSTNESS; MODEL; MARGINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The impact of treatment accuracy on NTCP-based patient selection for proton therapy is currently unknown. This study investigates this impact for oropharyngeal cancer patients. Materials and methods: Data of 78 patients was used to automatically generate treatment plans for a simultaneously integrated boost prescribing 70 Gy(RBE)/54.25 Gy(RBE) in 35 fractions. IMRT treatment plans were generated with three different margins; intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans for five different setup and range robustness settings. Four NTCP models were evaluated. Patients were selected for proton therapy if NTCP reduction was >= 10% or >= 5% for grade II or III complications, respectively. Results: The degree of robustness had little impact on patient selection for tube feeding dependence, while the margin had. For other complications the impact of the robustness setting was noticeably higher. For high-precision IMRT (3 mm margin) and high-precision IMPT (3 mm setup/3% range error), most patients were selected for proton therapy based on problems swallowing solid food (51.3%) followed by tube feeding dependence (37.2%), decreased parotid flow (29.5%), and patient-rated xerostomia (7.7%). Conclusions: Treatment accuracy has a significant impact on the number of patients selected for proton therapy. Therefore, it cannot be ignored in estimating the number of patients for proton therapy. (c) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 525
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT [J].
Astreinidou, E ;
Bel, A ;
Raaijmakers, CPJ ;
Terhaard, CHJ ;
Lagendijk, JJW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :938-944
[2]   Anatomy of the salivary glands [J].
Beale, Timothy ;
Madani, Gitta .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2006, 27 (06) :436-439
[3]   NTCP models for patient-rated xerostomia and sticky saliva after treatment with intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: The role of dosimetric and clinical factors [J].
Beetz, Ivo ;
Schilstra, Cornelis ;
van der Schaaf, Arjen ;
van den Heuvel, Edwin R. ;
Doornaert, Patricia ;
van Luijk, Peter ;
Vissink, Arjan ;
van der Laan, Bernard F. A. M. ;
Leemans, Charles R. ;
Bijl, Henk P. ;
Christianen, Miranda E. M. C. ;
Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M. ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 105 (01) :101-106
[4]   Clinical evaluation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers [J].
Bhide, S. A. ;
Newbold, K. L. ;
Harrington, K. J. ;
Nutting, C. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1013) :487-494
[5]   Toward a model-based patient selection strategy for proton therapy: External validation of photon-derived normal tissue complication probability models in a head and neck proton therapy cohort [J].
Blanchard, Pierre ;
Wong, Andrew J. ;
Gunn, G. Brandon ;
Garden, Adam S. ;
Mohamed, Abdallah S. R. ;
Rosenthal, David I. ;
Crutison, Joseph ;
Wu, Richard ;
Zhang, Xiaodong ;
Zhu, X. Ronald ;
Mohan, Radhe ;
Amin, Mayankkumar V. ;
Fuller, C. David ;
Frank, Steven J. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 121 (03) :381-386
[6]   iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans [J].
Breedveld, Sebastiaan ;
Storchi, Pascal R. M. ;
Voet, Peter W. J. ;
Heijmen, Ben J. M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (02) :951-963
[7]   The equivalence of multi-criteria methods for radiotherapy plan optimization [J].
Breedveld, Sebastiaan ;
Storchi, Pascal R. M. ;
Heijmen, Ben J. M. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (23) :7199-7209
[8]   CT-based delineation of organs at risk in the head and neck region: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology and TROG consensus guidelines [J].
Brouwer, Charlotte L. ;
Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M. ;
Bourhis, Jean ;
Budach, Wilfried ;
Grau, Cai ;
Gregoire, Vincent ;
van Herk, Marcel ;
Lee, Anne ;
Maingon, Philippe ;
Nutting, Chris ;
O'Sullivan, Brian ;
Porceddu, Sandro V. ;
Rosenthal, David I. ;
Sijtsema, Nanna M. ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 117 (01) :83-90
[9]   Long-term experience with reduced planning target volume margins and intensity-modulated radiotherapy with daily image-guidance for head and neck cancer [J].
Chen, Allen M. ;
Yu, Yao ;
Daly, Megan E. ;
Farwell, D. Gregory ;
Benedict, Stanley H. ;
Purdy, James A. .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2014, 36 (12) :1766-1772
[10]   Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Unkelbach, Jan ;
Trofimov, Alexei ;
Madden, Thomas ;
Kooy, Hanne ;
Bortfeld, Thomas ;
Craft, David .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (03) :591-608