Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds

被引:184
作者
Menkveld, R
Wong, WY
Lombard, CJ
Wetzels, AMM
Thomas, CMG
Merkus, HMWM
Steegers-Theunissen, RPM
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr St Radboud, Dept Chem Endocrinol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] MRC, Ctr Epidemiol Res S Africa, Biostat Div, Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr St Radboud, Dept Epidemiol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr St Radboud, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Stellenbosch, ZA-7505 Tygerberg, South Africa
[6] Tygerberg Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Reprod Biol Unit, ZA-7505 Tygerberg, South Africa
关键词
fertile and subfertile population; semen analysis; sperm morphology; strict criteria; WHO criteria;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/16.6.1165
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In this study, the semen analysis results of a fertile population were compared with those from a subfertile population, in order to establish normal cut-off values for the standard semen parameters with the aid of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The fertile group comprised healthy males (n = 107) without any history of fertility problems, the partners of whom had had a spontaneous pregnancy within one year of unprotected intercourse and were pregnant at the time of the male's inclusion into the study, A total of 103 males from couples attending the infertility clinic, and with an initial sperm count of < 20 x 10(6)/ml were recruited to form the subfertile population. The best discriminating parameter between the two populations was sperm morphology evaluated according to WHO criteria at a cut-off point of 31% normal spermatozoa. The other cut-off values were at 8% for the acrosome index, 45% for motility, and 4% normal spermatozoa for strict criteria. Recalculating the ROC curve cut-off values based on an assumed 50% prevalence of subfertility in an assisted reproductive setting, the cut-off points were reduced to 21% and 3% normal spermatozoa for WHO and strict criteria respectively. For motility, the new cut-off value was at 20% motile spermatozoa, for motility quality at 3.5 (on a scale of 1-6), the acrosome index at 3% normal acrosomes, and the teratozoospermia index at 2.09.
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1171
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ABARBANEL AR, 1951, FERTIL STERIL, V2, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction
[3]   CLINICAL-VALUE OF SPERM MORPHOLOGY FOR IN-VIVO FERTILITY - COMPARISON BETWEEN WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION CRITERIA OF 1987 AND 1992 [J].
BARRATT, CLR ;
NAEENI, M ;
CLEMENTS, S ;
COOKE, ID .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (03) :587-593
[4]   Relation between semen quality and fertility:: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners [J].
Bonde, JPE ;
Ernst, E ;
Jensen, TK ;
Hjollund, NHI ;
Kolstad, H ;
Henriksen, TB ;
Scheike, T ;
Giwercman, A ;
Olsen, J ;
Skakkebæk, NE .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9135) :1172-1177
[5]   REASSESSMENT OF THE ACCURACY OF TRADITIONAL SPERM CHARACTERISTICS AND ADENOSINE-TRIPHOSPHATE (ATP) IN ESTIMATING THE FERTILIZING POTENTIAL OF HUMAN-SEMEN INVIVO [J].
COMHAIRE, FH ;
VERMEULEN, L ;
SCHOONJANS, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 1987, 10 (05) :653-662
[6]   OBJECTIVE SEMEN ANALYSIS - HAS THE TARGET BEEN REACHED [J].
COMHAIRE, FH ;
HUYSSE, S ;
HINTING, A ;
VERMEULEN, L ;
SCHOONJANS, F .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1992, 7 (02) :237-241
[7]  
Efron B., 1993, MONOGR STAT APPL PRO, V57
[8]  
EggertKruse W, 1996, HUM REPROD, V11, P139
[9]  
Eliasson R, 1971, ANDROLOGIE, V3, P49, DOI [10.1111/j.1439-0272.1971.tb01125.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1439-0272.1971.TB01125.X]
[10]  
FREUND M, 1966, INT J FERTIL, V11, P97