The behavioural and electrophysiological effects of visual task difficulty and bimanual coordination mode during dual-task performance

被引:7
作者
Matthews, A. J. [1 ]
Martin, F. H. [1 ]
Garry, M. [1 ]
Summers, J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Psychol, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Bimanual coordination; Visual three-stimulus paradigm; Dual task; Event-related potentials; P3b; P3a; attentional resources; NEUROMAGNETIC ACTIVITY; TRADE-OFFS; P3A; ERP; P300; RESOURCES; ATTENTION; STIMULI; INTERFERENCE; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-009-1943-x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The difficulty of a visual three stimulus and a bimanual coordination task was manipulated by varying discrimination difficulty (easy, hard) and coordination mode (in-phase, anti-phase) respectively. Electroencephalographic activity was recorded from 32 sites whilst participants (n = 16) completed four dual-task conditions in counterbalanced order. Longer reaction time and lower accuracy were found for the hard relative to the easy visual task and, for the hard visual task, accuracy was lower under anti-phase relative to in-phase conditions. Amplitude and latency of event-related potential components P3a and P3b were recorded and measured. There was a reduction in P3b amplitude and increase in P3a amplitude for the hard visual task overall and a further reduction in frontal P3b amplitude under the more demanding anti-phase condition. For the easy visual task, however, P3b and P3a amplitude were greater under the anti-phase relative to in-phase coordination condition at left hemisphere frontal sites. These findings suggest that the attentional cost of stabilising anti-phase bimanual coordination is largely associated with top-down automatic processes subserved by the frontal attentional network.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 487
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1980, Attention and Performance
  • [2] Dissociable aspects of mental workload: Examinations of the P300 ERP component and performance assessments
    Baldwin, CL
    Coyne, JT
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIA, 2005, 48 (02) : 102 - 119
  • [3] Carson RG, 1997, Q J EXP PSYCHOL-A, V50, P664, DOI 10.1080/027249897392062
  • [4] P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli
    Comerchero, MD
    Polich, J
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 110 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [5] P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality
    Comerchero, MD
    Polich, J
    [J]. COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 7 (01): : 41 - 48
  • [6] STIMULUS NOVELTY, TASK RELEVANCE AND VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIAL IN MAN
    COURCHESNE, E
    HILLYARD, SA
    GALAMBOS, R
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1975, 39 (02): : 131 - 143
  • [7] ANXIETY AND PERFORMANCE - THE PROCESSING EFFICIENCY THEORY
    EYSENCK, MW
    CALVO, MG
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 1992, 6 (06) : 409 - 434
  • [8] EFFECTS OF CHOICE COMPLEXITY ON DIFFERENT SUBCOMPONENTS OF THE LATE POSITIVE COMPLEX OF THE EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL
    FALKENSTEIN, M
    HOHNSBEIN, J
    HOORMANN, J
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (02): : 148 - 160
  • [9] Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review
    Folstein, Jonathan R.
    Van Petten, Cyma
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 45 (01) : 152 - 170
  • [10] The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty
    Friedman, D
    Cycowicz, YM
    Gaeta, H
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2001, 25 (04) : 355 - 373