Structural characterization of an activin class ternary receptor complex reveals a third paradigm for receptor specificity

被引:40
作者
Goebel, Erich J. [1 ]
Corpina, Richard A. [2 ]
Hinck, Cynthia S. [3 ]
Czepnik, Magdalena [1 ]
Castonguay, Roselyne [4 ]
Grenha, Rosa [4 ]
Boisvert, Angela [4 ]
Miklossy, Gabriella [5 ]
Fullerton, Paul T. [5 ]
Matzuk, Martin M. [5 ]
Idone, Vincent J. [2 ]
Economides, Aris N. [2 ]
Kumar, Ravindra [4 ]
Hinck, Andrew P. [3 ]
Thompson, Thomas B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Mol Genet Biochem & Microbiol, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Regeneron Pharmaceut, Skeletal Dis Therapeut Focus Area, Tarrytown, NY 10591 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Struct Biol, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Acceleron Pharma, Discovery Grp, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pathol & Immunol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
GDF11; TGF-beta superfamily; activin; ternary signaling complex; Alk5; EXTRACELLULAR DOMAIN; BETA-RII; BINDING; INSIGHTS; RECOGNITION; ACTIVATION; MECHANISMS; SIGNALS; PATHWAY; MODES;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1906253116
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
TGF beta family ligands, which include the TGF beta s, BMPs, and activins, signal by forming a ternary complex with type I and type II receptors. For TGF beta s and BMPs, structures of ternary complexes have revealed differences in receptor assembly. However, structural information for how activins assemble a ternary receptor complex is lacking. We report the structure of an activin class member, GDF11, in complex with the type II receptor ActRIIB and the type I receptor Alk5. The structure reveals that receptor positioning is similar to the BMP class, with no interreceptor contacts; however, the type I receptor interactions are shifted toward the ligand fingertips and away from the dimer interface. Mutational analysis shows that ligand type I specificity is derived from differences in the fingertips of the ligands that interact with an extended loop specific to Alk4 and Alk5. The study also reveals differences for how TGF beta and GDF11 bind to the same type I receptor, Alk5. For GDF11, additional contacts at the fingertip region substitute for the interreceptor interactions that are seen for TGF beta, indicating that Alk5 binding to GDF11 is more dependent on direct contacts. In support, we show that a single residue of Alk5 (Phe(84)), when mutated, abolishes GDF11 signaling, but has little impact on TGF beta signaling. The structure of GDF11/ActRIIB/Alk5 shows that, across the TGF beta family, different mechanisms regulate type I receptor binding and specificity, providing a molecular explanation for how the activin class accommodates low-affinity type I interactions without the requirement of cooperative receptor interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:15505 / 15513
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine
    Afonine, Pavel V.
    Grosse-Kunstleve, Ralf W.
    Echols, Nathaniel
    Headd, Jeffrey J.
    Moriarty, Nigel W.
    Mustyakimov, Marat
    Terwilliger, Thomas C.
    Urzhumtsev, Alexandre
    Zwart, Peter H.
    Adams, Paul D.
    [J]. ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 68 : 352 - 367
  • [2] Structure of the ternary signaling complex of a TGF-β superfamily member
    Allendorph, George P.
    Vale, Wylie W.
    Choe, Senyon
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (20) : 7643 - 7648
  • [3] Growth differentiation factor 11 signals through the transforming growth factor-β receptor ALK5 to regionalize the anterior-posterior axis
    Andersson, Olov
    Reissmann, Eva
    Ibanez, Carlos F.
    [J]. EMBO REPORTS, 2006, 7 (08) : 831 - 837
  • [4] IDENTIFICATION OF HUMAN ACTIVIN AND TGF-BETA TYPE-I RECEPTORS THAT FORM HETEROMERIC KINASE COMPLEXES WITH TYPE-II RECEPTORS
    ATTISANO, L
    CARCAMO, J
    VENTURA, F
    WEIS, FMB
    MASSAGUE, J
    WRANA, JL
    [J]. CELL, 1993, 75 (04) : 671 - 680
  • [5] Transforming Growth Factor-β Family Ligands Can Function as Antagonists by Competing for Type II Receptor Binding
    Aykul, Senem
    Martinez-Hackert, Erik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 291 (20) : 10792 - 10804
  • [6] Structure of Myostatin.Follistatin-like 3 N-TERMINAL DOMAINS OF FOLLISTATIN-TYPE MOLECULES EXHIBIT ALTERNATE MODES OF BINDING
    Cash, Jennifer N.
    Angerman, Elizabeth B.
    Kattamuri, Chandramohan
    Nolan, Kristof
    Zhao, Huaying
    Sidis, Yisrael
    Keutmann, Henry T.
    Thompson, Thomas B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 287 (02) : 1043 - 1053
  • [7] The structure of myostatin: follistatin 288: insights into receptor utilization and heparin binding
    Cash, Jennifer N.
    Rejon, Carlis A.
    McPherron, Alexandra C.
    Bernard, Daniel J.
    Thompson, Thomas B.
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 2009, 28 (17) : 2662 - 2676
  • [8] Electron diffraction data processing with DIALS
    Clabbers, Max T. B.
    Gruene, Tim
    Parkhurst, James M.
    Abrahams, Jan Pieter
    Waterman, David G.
    [J]. ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 74 : 506 - 518
  • [9] Structure of the human myostatin precursor and determinants of growth factor latency
    Cotton, Thomas R.
    Fischer, Gerhard
    Wang, Xuelu
    McCoy, Jason C.
    Czepnik, Magdalena
    Thompson, Thomas B.
    Hyvonen, Marko
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 2018, 37 (03) : 367 - 383
  • [10] An activin receptor IIA ligand trap corrects ineffective erythropoiesis in β-thalassemia
    Dussiot, Michael
    Maciel, Thiago T.
    Fricot, Aurelie
    Chartier, Celine
    Negre, Olivier
    Veiga, Joel
    Grapton, Damien
    Paubelle, Etienne
    Payen, Emmanuel
    Beuzard, Yves
    Leboulch, Philippe
    Ribeil, Jean-Antoine
    Arlet, Jean-Benoit
    Cote, Francine
    Courtois, Genevieve
    Ginzburg, Yelena Z.
    Daniel, Thomas O.
    Chopra, Rajesh
    Sung, Victoria
    Hermine, Olivier
    Moura, Ivan C.
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2014, 20 (04) : 398 - +