Rating Evaluation of Fire Risk for Combustible Materials in Case of Fire

被引:10
|
作者
Chung, Yeong-Jin [1 ]
Jin, Eui [2 ]
机构
[1] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Fire Protect Engn, Samcheok 25949, South Korea
[2] Kangwon Natl Univ, Fire & Disaster Prevent Res Ctr, Samcheok 25913, South Korea
来源
APPLIED CHEMISTRY FOR ENGINEERING | 2021年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词
Wood; Plastic; Fire performance index-III (FPI-III); Fire growth index-III (FGI-III); Fire risk index-IV (FRI-IV); CONE CALORIMETER; WOOD; RETARDANT; MODEL;
D O I
10.14478/ace.2020.1103
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This study investigated the fire risk assessment of woods and plastics for construction materials, focusing on the fire performance index-III (FPI-III), fire growth index-III (FGI-III), and fire risk index-IV (FRI-IV) by a newly designed method. Japanese cedar, red pine, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) were used as test pieces. Fire characteristics of the materials were investigated using a cone calorimeter (ISO 5660-1) equipment. The fire performance index-III measured after the combustion reaction was found to be 1.0 to 15.0 with respect to PMMA. Fire risk by fire performance index-III increased in the order of PVC, red pine, Japanese cedar, and PMMA. The fire growth index-III was found to be 0.5 to 3.3 based on PMMA. Fire risk by fire growth index-III increased in the order of PVC, PMMA, red pine, and Japanese cedar. COpeak concentrations of all specimens were measured between 106 and 570 ppm. In conclusion, it is understood that Japanese cedar with a low bulk density and PMMA containing a large amount of volatile organic substances have a low fire performance index-III and high fire growth index-III, and thus have high fire risk due to fire. This was consistent with the fire risk index-IV.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 82
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fire risk evaluation using multicriteria analysis—a case study
    Krishna Prasad Vadrevu
    Anuradha Eaturu
    K. V. S. Badarinath
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2010, 166 : 223 - 239
  • [32] EVALUATION OF FIRE SAFETY OF DUCT MATERIALS
    SMITH, EE
    ASHRAE JOURNAL, 1971, 13 (12): : 34 - &
  • [33] Fire Severity Outcome Comparison of Apartment Buildings Constructed from Combustible and Non-Combustible Construction Materials
    Alex Zheng
    Len Garis
    Ian Pike
    Fire Technology, 2022, 58 : 1815 - 1825
  • [34] Fire Severity Outcome Comparison of Apartment Buildings Constructed from Combustible and Non-Combustible Construction Materials
    Zheng, Alex
    Garis, Len
    Pike, Ian
    FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 58 (04) : 1815 - 1825
  • [35] Development of an Algorithm for Calculating the Moisture Content and Time of Forest Fire Maturation of Forest Combustible Materials for Determining Forest Fire Hazards
    Aleksandrov, Anatoliy A.
    Ksenofontov, Boris S.
    Kozodaev, Alexey S.
    Taranov, Roman A.
    Vyazova, Victoriya D.
    Ivanov, Mikhail V.
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (08)
  • [36] Experimental Study of Combustible and Non-combustible Construction in a Natural Fire
    Li, Xiao
    Zhang, Xia
    Hadjisophocleous, George
    McGregor, Cameron
    FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 51 (06) : 1447 - 1474
  • [37] The development, systems, and evaluation of forest fire danger rating: A review
    2000, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute (15):
  • [38] Risk of fire analysis in industrial constructions: Fire risk evaluation in industrial and commercial constructions
    Fontana, Mario
    VDI Berichte, 2009, (2062): : 159 - 174
  • [39] A Forest Fire Warning Method Based on Fire Dangerous Rating
    Wang, Dan
    Xu, Lei
    Zhou, Yuanyuan
    Gao, Zhifu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INNOVATION, 2015, 12 : 195 - 199
  • [40] Fire-Rating as a Science
    Meyer, B. H.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1901, 10 (01) : 143 - 148