When innovation requirements empower individual innovation: the role of job complexity

被引:27
作者
Audenaert, Mieke [1 ]
Vanderstraeten, Alex [2 ]
Buyens, Dirk [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Econ & Business Adm, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Vlerick Business Sch, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Quantitative; Psychological empowerment; Individual innovation; Innovation requirements; Job complexity; EMPLOYEE-ORGANIZATION RELATIONSHIP; PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT; SUPERVISORY SUPPORT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; METHOD BIAS; CREATIVITY; WORK; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; WORKPLACE;
D O I
10.1108/PR-10-2014-0219
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the field's understanding of how to raise individual innovation. Specifically, the authors aim to contribute to an understanding of the interplay of job characteristics and intrinsic motivation for individual innovation. Design/methodology/approach - The study uses time-lagged survey data of a public service organization in Belgium. The analyses are based on more than 80 jobs and more than 1,000 employees. Hierarchical linear modeling was adopted to test cross-level hypotheses. Findings - Innovation requirements influence individual innovation efforts by psychologically empowering employees, but the extent to which psychological empowerment translates into individual innovation depends on job complexity. Originality/value - A more nuanced understanding is developed of when innovation requirements empower individual innovation, by acknowledging the role of job complexity in this relationship. The current findings contribute to a multilevel integrative understanding of the interplay of the job context and intrinsic motivation.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 623
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]   To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance [J].
Ahearne, M ;
Mathieu, J ;
Rapp, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (05) :945-955
[3]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction
[5]   Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework [J].
Anderson, Neil ;
Potocnik, Kristina ;
Zhou, Jing .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) :1297-1333
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Monte Carlo Method for Assessing Mediation: an Interactive Tool for Creating Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1980, WORK REDESIGN
[8]  
Audenaert M., 2016, INT J HUMAN IN PRESS
[9]  
Bernardin John H., 2013, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAG, V6th ed.
[10]  
Bliese P.D., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P476