Does ownership type affect environmental disclosure?

被引:53
作者
Acar, Ece [1 ]
Caliyurt, Kiymet Tunca [2 ]
Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu, Yasemin [3 ]
机构
[1] Yasar Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Trakya Univ, Business Adm Dept, Edirne, Turkey
[3] Univ Groningen, Dept Accountancy, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Biodiversity disclosure; Climate change disclosure; Ownership type; Countries' development level; CORPORATE-GOVERNANCE; VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; DETERMINANTS; MANAGEMENT; MARKET; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2020-0016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose In recent years, firms tend to direct their attention in communicating their environmental actions with their stakeholders. However, the level of environmental disclosers varies significantly among firms. This paper aims to explain the variation in environmental disclosure of firms based on their ownership type, namely - state ownership and institutional ownership. The study further aims to understand whether and how the relationship between ownership structure and environmental disclosure changes regarding countries' development levels. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a sample of 27,847 firm-year observations from 72 countries/economic districts between the years 2002 and 2017 and regression analysis to test how the relationship between different ownership structures and environmental disclosure and whether this relation is conditional on countries' development levels. Findings This study finds that firms with higher state ownership have higher environmental disclosures and higher institutional ownership has a negative effect on environmental disclosures. Furthermore, this paper also documents that firms with higher state ownership and operating in developed countries have incrementally higher environmental disclosure, relative to firms operating in developing countries. Research limitations/implications The study has limitations that would provide possible starting points for further research. The first limitation is related to the environmental disclosure measure, which reflects the level of environmental disclosure of firms based on their disclosure information given in the Thomson Reuters, Asset4 database. A more refined measure can be constructed using hand-collected data based on linguistic analysis, which may reflect not only the level of the disclosure but also the quality of the environmental disclosure. The second limitation is the limited focus of the study toward state and institutional shareholding. Therefore, future research may consider examining the different types of ownership such as family ownership. Practical implications The findings of the study may help policymakers and regulators to consider the potential impact of various ownership types on environmental disclosures. Also, given the impact of countries' development levels, regulators should consider that a one-size-fits-all is not applicable in environmental disclosures. Therefore, each country should consider the institutional dynamics of their operating environment to set appropriate regulations to enhance environmental disclosures. Social implications From a social perspective, the findings indicate that firms' stakeholder engagement via environmental disclosures depends on the type of the controlling shareholders. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by developing a new construct for environmental disclosure based on Biodiversity, Climate Change, Environmental Investments and Spill Impact Reduction performance measures. Further, grounding on legitimacy and stakeholder theories, this study shows the influence of ownership type on environmental disclosures and how this effect changes in accordance with the countries' development.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 141
页数:22
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Ali W., 2013, International Journal of Asian Social Science, V3, P590
[2]   Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review [J].
Ali, Waris ;
Frynas, Jedrzej George ;
Mahmood, Zeeshan .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (04) :273-294
[3]  
Amosh H. Al., 2020, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, DOI [10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i3/7054, DOI 10.6007/IJARBSS/V10-I3/7054, 10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i3/7054]
[4]   Determinants of Climate Change Disclosure by Developed and Emerging Countries in Asia Pacific [J].
Amran, Azlan ;
Periasamy, Vinod ;
Zulkafli, Abdul Hadi .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 22 (03) :188-204
[5]   Relationship of firm attributes, ownership structure and business network on climate change efforts: evidence from Malaysia [J].
Amran, Azlan ;
Ooi, Say Keat ;
Nejati, Mehran ;
Zulkafli, Abdul Hadi ;
Lim, Boey Ann .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) :406-414
[6]   Towards a comprehensive theoretical framework for voluntary IC disclosure [J].
An, Yi ;
Davey, Howard ;
Eggleton, Ian R. C. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2011, 12 (04) :571-+
[7]   A study of the determinants of environmental disclosure quality: evidence from French listed companies [J].
Baalouch, Fatma ;
Ayadi, Salma Damak ;
Hussainey, Khaled .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE, 2019, 23 (04) :939-971
[8]   Role of Country- and Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure [J].
Baldini, Maria ;
Dal Maso, Lorenzo ;
Liberatore, Giovanni ;
Mazzi, Francesco ;
Terzani, Simone .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 150 (01) :79-98
[9]   Accruals management, investor sophistication, and equity valuation: Evidence from 10-Q filings [J].
Balsam, S ;
Bartov, E ;
Marquardt, C .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (04) :987-1012
[10]   Managerial and investor responses to disclosure regulation: The case of Reg FD and conference calls [J].
Bushee, BJ ;
Matsumoto, DA ;
Miller, GS .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (03) :617-643