Comparison between the Severity Scoring Systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for Predicting Safe Discharge from the Emergency Department in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

被引:7
作者
Limapichat, Thanya [1 ]
Supavajana, Suvanun [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Songklanagarind Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Emergency Med, Hat Yai, Thailand
关键词
MANAGEMENT; VALIDATION; ADULTS; RULES; JUDGMENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1155/2022/6391141
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. In most community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment guidelines, the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 are used as prognostic tools. Recently, simpler and more effective predictive tools for CAP treatment, such as the A-DROP scoring system, have been developed. However, no study has performed a comparative evaluation to identify the superior tool for predicting when patients can be discharged safely. Objectives. To compare the performances of A-DROP and CURB-65, simple predictive tools for CAP, based on 30-day death rates and 72-hour revisit rates for CAP following discharge from the emergency department (ED). Method. This single-center retrospective observational study enrolled patients who were at least 18 years old and diagnosed with CAP at the Songklanagarind Hospital ED from January 2015 to April 2021. Following a severity assessment using the A-DROP and CURB-65 scoring systems, the 30-day mortality rates and 72-hour revisit rates after discharge from the ED were compared. Results. A total of 408 patients were enrolled in this study. Six (1.47%) died within 30 days after presentation, whereas 29 (7.1%) returned to the ED within 72 hours after discharge. Most patients (72%) who revisited the ED were over the age of 65 years. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the prediction of 30-day mortality were 0.756 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.526-0.987) and 0.808 (95% CI: 0.647-0.970) for A-DROP and CURB-65, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the prediction of 72-hour revisit were 0.617 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.507-0.728) and 0.639 (95% CI: 0.536-0.743) for A-DROP and CURB-65, respectively. Conclusion. A-DROP and CURB-65 yield similar results and can be used to assess low-risk patients with CAP for discharge from the ED. Older patients, even those with low-risk scores, should be particularly considered for admission to a short-term observation unit or ward.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] The JRS guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: An update and new recommendations
    Miyashita, Naoyuki
    Matsushima, Toshiharu
    Oka, Mikio
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 45 (07) : 419 - 428
  • [22] Ngamjarus C., 2014, N4UDIES SAMPLE SIZE
  • [23] Adults Hospitalized With Pneumonia in the United States: Incidence, Epidemiology, and Mortality
    Ramirez, Julio A.
    Wiemken, Timothy L.
    Peyrani, Paula
    Arnold, Forest W.
    Kelley, Robert
    Mattingly, William A.
    Nakamatsu, Raul
    Pena, Senen
    Guinn, Brian E.
    Furmanek, Stephen P.
    Persaud, Annuradha K.
    Raghuram, Anupama
    Fernandez, Francisco
    Beavin, Leslie
    Bosson, Rahel
    Fernandez-Botran, Rafael
    Cavallazzi, Rodrigo
    Bordon, Jose
    Valdivieso, Claudia
    Schulte, Joann
    Carrico, Ruth M.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 65 (11) : 1806 - 1812
  • [24] Clinical judgment versus the pneumonia severity index in making the admission decision
    Seymann, Gregory
    Barger, Khamisah
    Choo, Susan
    Sawhney, Sajeet
    Davis, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 34 (03) : 261 - 268
  • [25] Comparison of severity scoring systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for community-acquired pneumonia
    Shindo, Yuichiro
    Sato, Shinji
    Maruyama, Eiichi
    Ohashi, Takamasa
    Ogawa, Masahiro
    Imaizumi, Kazuyoshi
    Hasegawa, Yoshinori
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2008, 13 (05) : 731 - 735
  • [26] Wayne WD., 1995, Biostatistics: A foundation of analysis in the health sciences, V6th