Comparison between the Severity Scoring Systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for Predicting Safe Discharge from the Emergency Department in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

被引:7
作者
Limapichat, Thanya [1 ]
Supavajana, Suvanun [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Songklanagarind Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Emergency Med, Hat Yai, Thailand
关键词
MANAGEMENT; VALIDATION; ADULTS; RULES; JUDGMENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1155/2022/6391141
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. In most community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment guidelines, the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 are used as prognostic tools. Recently, simpler and more effective predictive tools for CAP treatment, such as the A-DROP scoring system, have been developed. However, no study has performed a comparative evaluation to identify the superior tool for predicting when patients can be discharged safely. Objectives. To compare the performances of A-DROP and CURB-65, simple predictive tools for CAP, based on 30-day death rates and 72-hour revisit rates for CAP following discharge from the emergency department (ED). Method. This single-center retrospective observational study enrolled patients who were at least 18 years old and diagnosed with CAP at the Songklanagarind Hospital ED from January 2015 to April 2021. Following a severity assessment using the A-DROP and CURB-65 scoring systems, the 30-day mortality rates and 72-hour revisit rates after discharge from the ED were compared. Results. A total of 408 patients were enrolled in this study. Six (1.47%) died within 30 days after presentation, whereas 29 (7.1%) returned to the ED within 72 hours after discharge. Most patients (72%) who revisited the ED were over the age of 65 years. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the prediction of 30-day mortality were 0.756 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.526-0.987) and 0.808 (95% CI: 0.647-0.970) for A-DROP and CURB-65, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the prediction of 72-hour revisit were 0.617 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.507-0.728) and 0.639 (95% CI: 0.536-0.743) for A-DROP and CURB-65, respectively. Conclusion. A-DROP and CURB-65 yield similar results and can be used to assess low-risk patients with CAP for discharge from the ED. Older patients, even those with low-risk scores, should be particularly considered for admission to a short-term observation unit or ward.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Expanded A-DROP Score: A New Scoring System for the Prediction of Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Community-acquired Pneumonia
    Ahn, June Hong
    Choi, Eunyoung
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [2] Anderson E., 2020, TINTINALLIS EMERGENC, V9th, P439
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, INF CURR INT INF DIS
  • [4] Prospective comparison of three validated prediction rules for prognosis in community-acquired pneumonia
    Aujesky, D
    Auble, TE
    Yealy, DM
    Stone, RA
    Obrosky, DS
    Meehan, TP
    Graff, LG
    Fine, JM
    Fine, MJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 118 (04) : 384 - 392
  • [5] Validation of a predictive rule for the management of community-acquired pneumonia
    Capelastegul, A
    España, PP
    Quintana, JM
    Areltio, I
    Gorordo, I
    Egurrola, M
    Bilbao, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (01) : 151 - 157
  • [6] Outpatient care compared with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia -: A randomized trial in low-risk patients
    Carratalà, J
    Fernández-Sabé, N
    Ortega, L
    Castellsagué, X
    Rosón, B
    Dorca, J
    Fernández-Agüera, A
    Verdaguer, R
    Martínez, J
    Manresa, F
    Gudiol, F
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (03) : 165 - 172
  • [7] Can we use severity assessment tools to increase outpatient management of community-acquired pneumonia?
    Chalmers, James D.
    Rutherford, Julia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 23 (05) : 398 - 406
  • [8] Physician judgement is a crucial adjunct to pneumonia severity scores in low-risk patients
    Choudhury, G.
    Chalmers, J. D.
    Mandal, P.
    Akram, A. R.
    Murray, M. P.
    Short, P.
    Singanayagam, A.
    Hill, A. T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2011, 38 (03) : 643 - 648
  • [9] Elixhauser A., 1999, Hospital inpatient statistics, 1996: Tools for decisionmaking & research
  • [10] A prediction rule to identify allocation of inpatient care in community-acquired pneumonia
    España, PP
    Capelastegui, A
    Quintana, JM
    Soto, A
    Gorordo, I
    García-Urbaneja, M
    Bilbao, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2003, 21 (04) : 695 - 701