Heliosheath Magnetic Field and Plasma Observed by Voyager 2 during 2015 Near Solar Maximum

被引:14
|
作者
Burlaga, L. F. [1 ]
Ness, N. F. [2 ]
Richardson, J. D. [3 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] Catholic Univ Amer, Inst Astrophys & Computat Sci, Washington, DC 20064 USA
[3] MIT, Kavli Ctr Astrophys & Space Res, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
solar wind; Sun: magnetic fields; MERGED INTERACTION REGIONS; COSMIC-RAY MODULATION; WIND; HELIOPAUSE; PRESSURE; SHOCK;
D O I
10.3847/1538-4357/aac6b8
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We discuss magnetic field and plasma observations of the heliosheath made by Voyager 2 (V2) during 2015, when V2 was observing the effects of near-maximum solar activity during solar cycle 24 following the solar minimum in 2009. The average magnetic field strength B was relatively high, 0.126 nT, as expected for solar maximum. A sector structure was observed with nearly equal maximum values of the distribution of directions of daily averages at approximately 90 degrees and 180 degrees, consistent with the Parker spiral magnetic field directions in the heliosheath. This structure indicates that the heliospheric current sheet (HCS) extended to high latitudes above V2 throughout most of 2015. The analysis of one sector boundary confirmed that the HCS was highly inclined (47 degrees) with respect to the equatorial plane. The small-scale increments in B can be described by a (q) under bar -Gaussian distribution with q = 1.60 +/- 0.17 for daily averages and q = 1.66 +/- 0.03 for hourly averages. The magnetic flux BVRR increased at V2, indicating that there was no significant loss of magnetic energy during 2015. Two merged interaction regions and a global merged interaction region (GMIR) were observed. The flow speed increased as the GMIR moved past V2, indicating that the GMIR was still being compressed by the flow. The GMIR caused a major decrease in the >70 MeV/nuc cosmic-ray intensity. It is likely that the GMIR is causally related to a shock-like disturbance observed by Voyager 1 in the draped interstellar magnetic field beyond the heliopause.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effects of a local interstellar magnetic field on Voyager 1 and 2 observations
    Opher, M
    Stone, EC
    Liewer, PC
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 640 (01) : L71 - L74
  • [32] MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH FLUCTUATIONS AND THE q-TRIPLET IN THE HELIOSHEATH: VOYAGER 2 OBSERVATIONS FROM 91.0 TO 94.2 AU AT LATITUDE 30° S
    Burlaga, L. F.
    Ness, N. F.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 765 (01)
  • [33] Interplanetary and solar surface properties of coronal holes observed during solar maximum
    Zhang, J
    Woch, J
    Solanki, SK
    von Steiger, R
    Forsyth, R
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2003, 108 (A4)
  • [34] The Heliospheric Magnetic Field at Solar Maximum: Ulysses Observations
    André Balogh
    Edward J. Smith
    Space Science Reviews, 2001, 97 : 147 - 160
  • [35] Photospheric plasma and magnetic field dynamics during the formation of solar AR 11190
    Campos Rozo, J. I.
    Utz, D.
    Vargas Dominguez, S.
    Veronig, A.
    Van Doorsselaere, T.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2019, 622
  • [36] Plasma densities near and beyond the heliopause from the Voyager 1 and 2 plasma wave instruments
    Gurnett, D. A.
    Kurth, W. S.
    NATURE ASTRONOMY, 2019, 3 (11) : 1024 - 1028
  • [37] Diagnosing the Magnetic Field Structure of a Coronal Cavity Observed during the 2017 Total Solar Eclipse
    Chen, Yajie
    Tian, Hui
    Su, Yingna
    Qu, Zhongquan
    Deng, Linhua
    Jibben, Patricia R.
    Yang, Zihao
    Zhang, Jingwen
    Samanta, Tanmoy
    He, Jiansen
    Wang, Linghua
    Zhu, Yingjie
    Zhong, Yue
    Liang, Yu
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 856 (01)
  • [38] Magnetic Domains in the Heliosphere During Solar Maximum Years
    I.S. Veselovsky
    Space Science Reviews, 2001, 97 : 109 - 112
  • [40] Multiple-point Modeling the Parker Spiral Configuration of the Solar Wind Magnetic Field at the Solar Maximum of Solar Cycle 24
    Chang, Qing
    Xu, Xiaojun
    Xu, Qi
    Zhong, Jun
    Xu, Jiaying
    Wang, Jing
    Zhang, Tielong
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 884 (02)