A comprehensive comparison among different types of geothermal plants from exergy and thermoeconomic points of view

被引:27
作者
Fallah, M. [1 ]
Ghiasi, R. Akbarpour [2 ]
Mokarram, N. Hasani [1 ]
机构
[1] Azarbaijan Shahid Madani Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Univ Tabriz, Dept Mech Engn, Bldg 8,29 Bahman Ave, Tabriz 5166614766, Iran
关键词
Flash cycle; Binary cycle; Organic Rankin cycle; Exergy; Thermoeconomic analysis; POWER-PLANTS; KALINA CYCLE; OPTIMIZATION; ENERGY; ORCS; EFFICIENCY; PRESSURE; SYSTEM; FLUID; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsep.2017.10.017
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In present study, some chosen cycles of the geothermal power plant, such as dry steam cycle, single, double and triple flash cycles and different configurations of the organic Rankine cycle have been investigated and compared with each other using energy, exergy and thermoeconomic analyses. Effective parameters on efficiency and exergy destruction, such as flash pressure in flash cycles and extraction steam pressure in organic Rankine cycles have been optimized and the optimized conditions have been used for economic analyses. Results of the thermodynamic analysis show that the dry steam cycle has the maximum energy and exergy efficiency among all the considered systems in current study. Furthermore, the results show that the power capacity in double flash cycle is 27.7% higher than that in single flash cycle and also the triple flash cycle generates 10% more power than the double flash cycle. Despite of the acceptable performance of the triple flash cycle from thermodynamic point of view, the obtained results from thermoeconomic analysis indicates that using this system is not cost effective. Moreover, when a same value for geofluid inlet exergy is considered for all the systems mentioned in present work, the results of analysis emphasize that the dry steam cycle is the best system from thermoeconomic point of view, followed by the single flash and double flash cycles.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview [J].
Barbier, E .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2002, 6 (1-2) :3-65
[2]   Geothermal power generation in the world 2010-2014 update report [J].
Bertani, Ruggero .
GEOTHERMICS, 2016, 60 :31-43
[3]   Exergetic and economic comparison of ORC and Kalina cycle for low temperature enhanced geothermal system in Brazil [J].
Campos Rodriguez, Carlos Eymel ;
Escobar Palacio, Jose Carlos ;
Venturini, Osvaldo J. ;
Silva Lora, Electo E. ;
Cobas, Vladimir Melian ;
dos Santos, Daniel Marques ;
Lofrano Dotto, Fabio R. ;
Gialluca, Vernei .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 52 (01) :109-119
[4]   Geothermal power plants with maximized specific power output: Optimal working fluid and operating conditions of subcritical and transcritical Organic Rankine Cycles [J].
Chagnon-Lessard, Noemie ;
Mathieu-Potvin, Francois ;
Gosselin, Louis .
GEOTHERMICS, 2016, 64 :111-124
[5]   World geothermal power production status: Energy, environmental and economic study of high enthalpy technologies [J].
Chamorro, Cesar R. ;
Mondejar, Maria E. ;
Ramos, Roberto ;
Segovia, Jose J. ;
Martin, Maria C. ;
Villamanan, Miguel A. .
ENERGY, 2012, 42 (01) :10-18
[6]   Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of various power cycles for a geothermal resource [J].
Coskun, Ahmet ;
Bolatturk, Ali ;
Kanoglu, Mehmet .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2016, 38 (06) :850-856
[7]   Thermodynamic and economic analysis and optimization of power cycles for a medium temperature geothermal resource [J].
Coskun, Ahmet ;
Bolatturk, Ali ;
Kanoglu, Mehmet .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 78 :39-49
[8]   Second law assessment of binary plants generating power from low-temperature geothermal fluids [J].
DiPippo, R .
GEOTHERMICS, 2004, 33 (05) :565-586
[9]  
DiPippo R, 2012, GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANTS: PRINCIPLES, APPLICATIONS, CASE STUDIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, 3RD EDITION, P1
[10]   Geothermal power plants: Evolution and performance assessments [J].
DiPippo, Ronald .
GEOTHERMICS, 2015, 53 :291-307