Facilitators of community participation in an Aboriginal sexual health promotion initiative

被引:9
|
作者
Chambers, Alana Hulme [1 ]
Tomnay, Jane [2 ]
Stephens, Kylie [1 ]
Crouch, Alan [3 ]
Whiteside, Mary [4 ]
Love, Pettina [5 ]
McIntosh, Leonie [6 ]
Crowe, Peter Waples [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Rural Hlth, Ctr Excellence Rural Sexual Hlth, Wangaratta, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Rural Hlth, Ctr Excellence Rural Sexual Hlth, Shepparton, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Rural Hlth, Ballarat, Vic, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[5] La Trobe Univ, Wodonga, Vic, Australia
[6] Charles Sturt Univ, Thurgoona, NSW, Australia
[7] Victorian Aboriginal Community Controlled Hlth Se, Collingwood, Vic, Australia
来源
RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH | 2018年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
Australian; Aboriginal; community participation; health promotion; qualitative;
D O I
10.22605/RRH4245
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Community participation is a collaborative process aimed at achieving community-identified outcomes. However, approaches to community participation within Aboriginal health promotion initiatives have been inconsistent and not well documented. Smart and Deadly was a community-led initiative to develop sexual health promotion resources with young Aboriginal people in regional Victoria, Australia. The principles of community-centred practice, authentic participatory processes and respect for the local cultural context guided the initiative. The aim of this article is to report factors that facilitated community participation undertaken in the Smart and Deadly initiative to inform future projects and provide further evidence in demonstrating the value of such approaches. Methods: A summative evaluation of the Smart and Deadly initiative was undertaken approximately 2 years after the initiative ended. Five focus groups and 13 interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 32 participants who were involved with Smart and Deadly in one of the following ways: project participant, stakeholder or project partner, or project developer or designer. A deductive content analysis was undertaken and themes were compared to the YARN model, which was specifically created for planning and evaluating community participation strategies relating to Aboriginal sexual health promotion. Results: A number of factors that facilitated community participation approaches used in Smart and Deadly were identified. The overarching theme was that trust was the foundation upon which the facilitators of community participation ensued. These facilitators were cultural safety and cultural literacy, community control, and legacy and sustainability. Whilst the YARN model was highly productive in identifying these facilitators of community participation, the model did not have provision for the element of trust between workers and community. Given the importance of trust between the project team and the Aboriginal community in the Smart and Deadly initiative, a suggested revision to the YARN model is that trust is included as the basis upon which YARN model factors are predicated. Conclusions: Adding trust to the YARN model as a basis upon which YARN model factors are grounded assists future Aboriginal health promotion projects in ensuring community participation approaches are more likely to be acceptable to the Aboriginal community.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Making space for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community health workers in health promotion
    Conte, Kathleen P.
    Gwynn, Josephine
    Turner, Nicole
    Koller, Claudia
    Gillham, Karen E.
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 35 (03) : 562 - 574
  • [22] Workforce insights on how health promotion is practised in an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service
    McFarlane, Kathryn
    Devine, Sue
    Judd, Jenni
    Nichols, Nina
    Watt, Kerrianne
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2017, 23 (03) : 243 - 248
  • [23] Barriers and facilitators to treatment participation by adolescents in a community mental health clinic
    Oruche, U. M.
    Downs, S.
    Holloway, E.
    Draucker, C.
    Aalsma, M.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2014, 21 (03) : 241 - 248
  • [24] EPIDEMIOLOGIC MEASURES OF PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY-HEALTH PROMOTION PROJECTS
    ODDY, WH
    HOLMAN, CDJ
    CORTI, B
    DONOVAN, RJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 24 (05) : 1013 - 1021
  • [25] Community participation in health promotion: evaluation of the California Wellness Guide
    Neuhauser, L
    Schwab, M
    Syme, L
    Bieber, M
    Obarski, SK
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 13 (03) : 211 - 222
  • [26] The contradictory effects of timelines on community participation in a health promotion programme
    Batten, Lesley
    Holdaway, Maureen
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 26 (03) : 330 - 337
  • [27] Comparison of participation in federal worksite and community health promotion programs
    Crump, CE
    Shegog, R
    Gottlieb, NH
    Grunbaum, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2001, 15 (04) : 232 - 236
  • [28] Scientific rigor and community participation in health promotion research: Are they compatible?
    Allison, KR
    Rootman, I
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 11 (04) : 333 - 340
  • [29] Health promotion initiative: A dementia-friendly local community in Sweden
    Odzakovic, Elzana
    Hellstrom, Ingrid
    Nedlund, Ann-Charlotte
    Kullberg, Agneta
    DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (06): : 1971 - 1987
  • [30] The use of Goal Attainment Scaling in a community health promotion initiative with seniors
    Kloseck M.
    BMC Geriatrics, 7 (1)