Evaluation of quality-of-life measures for use in palliative care: a systematic review

被引:100
作者
Albers, Gwenda [1 ,2 ]
Echteld, Michael A. [1 ,2 ]
de Vet, Henrica C. W. [3 ]
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D. [1 ,2 ]
van der Linden, Mecheline H. M. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Deliens, Luc [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Palliat Care Ctr Expertise, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Brussel, End Of Life Care Res Grp, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
palliative care; end of life; quality of life; instruments; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT SCALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT-TOOL; ADVANCED CANCER-PATIENTS; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; FAMILY-MEMBERS; EORTC QLQ-C30; PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION; ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS; QUESTIONNAIRE MODULE; PHYSICAL SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1177/0269216309346593
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: In this literature review we evaluated the feasibility and clinimetric quality of quality-of-life (QoL) measurement instruments suitable for use in palliative care. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify instruments measuring (at least one domain of) QoL. We selected articles that present data on patients receiving palliative care and at least one measurement property. A checklist was used to describe the characteristics of the instruments, and a widely accepted rating list was used to evaluate the clinimetric aspects. Results: 29 instruments were identified and evaluated, most of which were targeted at palliative patients in general. None of the instruments demonstrated satisfactory results for all measurement properties. Fourteen instruments received positive ratings for construct validity. Thirteen instruments were tested for reliability, but only two were tested adequately and had positive results (ICC>0.70). Responsiveness was not tested adequately for any of the instruments. Very few of the studies provided information on the interpretation of the scores. Overall, the MQOL, followed by the QUAL-E and the QODD, received the best ratings for their measurement properties. Conclusions: Many measurement instruments were identified, but most had not yet been adequately evaluated. The evaluation of existing instruments with good content validity should have priority over the development of new instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 37
页数:21
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   EORTC QLQ-INFO26: A questionnaire to assess information given to cancer patients a preliminary analysis in eight countries [J].
Arraras, Juan Ignacio ;
Kuljanic-Vlasic, Karin ;
Bjordal, Kristin ;
Yun, Young Ho ;
Efficace, Fabio ;
Holzner, Bernhard ;
Mills, Judith ;
Greimel, Elfriede ;
Krauss, Oliver ;
Velikova, Galina .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 16 (03) :249-254
[2]   The development of the Canberra symptom scorecard: a tool to monitor the physical symptoms of patients with advanced tumours [J].
Barresi, MJ ;
Shadbolt, B ;
Byrne, D ;
Stuart-Harris, R .
BMC CANCER, 2003, 3 (1)
[3]   Illusions in advanced cancer: The effect of belief systems and attitudes on quality of life [J].
Beadle, GF ;
Yates, PM ;
Najman, JM ;
Clavarino, A ;
Thomson, D ;
Williams, G ;
Kenny, L ;
Roberts, S ;
Mason, B ;
Schlect, D .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2004, 13 (01) :26-36
[4]   Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale [J].
Bjorner, JB ;
Petersen, MA ;
Groenvold, M ;
Aaronson, N ;
Ahlner-Elmqvist, M ;
Arraras, JI ;
Brédart, A ;
Fayers, P ;
Jordhoy, M ;
Sprangers, M ;
Watson, M ;
Young, T .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (10) :1683-1697
[5]   Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-STO 22, to assess quality of life in patients with gastric cancer [J].
Blazeby, JM ;
Conroy, T ;
Bottomley, A ;
Vickery, C ;
Arraras, J ;
Sezer, O ;
Moore, J ;
Koller, M ;
Turhal, NS ;
Stuart, R ;
van Cutsem, E ;
D'haese, S ;
Coens, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (15) :2260-2268
[6]   Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer [J].
Blazeby, JM ;
Conroy, T ;
Hammerlid, E ;
Fayers, P ;
Sezer, O ;
Koller, M ;
Arraras, J ;
Bottomley, A ;
Vickery, CW ;
Etienne, PL ;
Alderson, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 39 (10) :1384-1394
[7]  
Bruley D K, 1999, J Palliat Med, V2, P299, DOI 10.1089/jpm.1999.2.299
[8]   Measuring quality of life for patients with terminal illness:: the Missoula-VITAS® quality of life index [J].
Byock, IR ;
Merriman, MP .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 12 (04) :231-244
[9]   Measuring patient outcomes in palliative care: a reliability and validity study of the Support Team Assessment Schedule [J].
Carson, MG ;
Fitch, MI ;
Vachon, MLS .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 14 (01) :25-36
[10]   A nationwide VA palliative care quality measure: The Family Assessment of Treatment at the End of Life [J].
Casarett, David ;
Pickard, Amy ;
Bailey, F. Amos ;
Ritchie, Christine Seel ;
Furman, Christian Davis ;
Rosenfeld, Ken ;
Shreve, Scott ;
Shea, Judy .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 11 (01) :68-75