Improving Wind-Ramp Forecasts in the Stable Boundary Layer

被引:11
作者
Jahn, David E. [1 ]
Takle, Eugene S. [1 ]
Gallus, William A., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, 1130 Coover Hall, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Boundary-layer parametrization; Wind forecasts; Wind ramps; TURBULENCE CLOSURE-MODEL; PART I; PARAMETERIZATION; PREDICTION; STATE;
D O I
10.1007/s10546-017-0237-2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The viability of wind-energy generation is dependent on highly accurate numerical wind forecasts, which are impeded by inaccuracies in model representation of boundary-layer processes. This study revisits the basic theory of the Mellor, Yamada, Nakanishi, and Niino (MYNN) planetary boundary-layer parametrization scheme, focusing on the onset of wind-ramp events related to nocturnal low-level jets. Modifications to the MYNN scheme include: (1) calculation of new closure parameters that determine the relative effects of turbulent energy production, dissipation, and redistribution; (2) enhanced mixing in the stable boundary layer when the mean wind speed exceeds a specified threshold; (3) explicit accounting of turbulent potential energy in the energy budget. A mesoscale model is used to generate short-term (24 h) wind forecasts for a set of 15 cases from both the U.S.A. and Germany. Results show that the new set of closure parameters provides a marked forecast improvement only when used in conjunction with the new mixing length formulation and only for cases that are originally under- or over-forecast (10 of the 15 cases). For these cases, the mean absolute error (MAE) of wind forecasts at turbine-hub height is reduced on average by 17%. A reduction in MAE values on average by 26% is realized for these same cases when accounting for the turbulent potential energy together with the new mixing length. This last method results in an average reduction by at least 13% in MAE values across all 15 cases.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 446
页数:24
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, TECH REP
[2]   A Wind Energy Ramp Tool and Metric for Measuring the Skill of Numerical Weather Prediction Models [J].
Bianco, Laura ;
Djalalova, Irina V. ;
Wilczak, James M. ;
Cline, Joel ;
Calvert, Stan ;
Konopleva-Akish, Elena ;
Finley, Cathy ;
Freedman, Jeffrey .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2016, 31 (04) :1137-1156
[3]   Atmospheric boundary layer measurements at the 280 m high Hamburg weather mast 1995-2011: mean annual and diurnal cycles [J].
Bruemmer, Burghard ;
Lange, Ingo ;
Konow, Heike .
METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2012, 21 (04) :319-335
[4]  
Chen F, 2001, MON WEATHER REV, V129, P569, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   A WRF Ensemble for Improved Wind Speed Forecasts at Turbine Height [J].
Deppe, Adam J. ;
Gallus, William A., Jr. ;
Takle, Eugene S. .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2013, 28 (01) :212-228
[7]  
DUDHIA J, 1989, J ATMOS SCI, V46, P3077, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<3077:NSOCOD>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   WHITHER THE STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER? A Shift in the Research Agenda [J].
Fernando, H. J. S. ;
Weil, J. C. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 91 (11) :1475-1484
[10]  
General Electric Company, 2005, TECHNICAL REPORT, P4