Worth the Risk? Muddled Relationships in Community-Based Participatory Research

被引:50
作者
Mayan, Maria J. [1 ]
Daum, Christine H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB T5J 0B2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Rehabil Sci, Edmonton, AB T5J 0B2, Canada
关键词
community-based participatory research; partnership; relationship; friendship; community members; Canada; EFFECTIVE RECRUITMENT; FRIENDSHIP; WORKING; COLLABORATION; REFLECTIONS; POPULATIONS; RECIPROCITY; CHALLENGES; STRATEGIES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1177/1049732315618660
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a collaborative research approach that has two purposes: (a) to generate knowledge about and (b) to take action to improve the lives of people facing health, social, economic, political, and environmental inequities. The foundation of all CBPR projects is its partnershipits cooperative relationship between community members, service providers, program planners, policy makers, and academics. It is with peopleand through relationshipsthat partnerships are built and sustained. Although relationships between academics and community members are critical to creating knowledge and change, they are overlooked in the literature. We often hear about CBPR gone wrong, when tensions and conflicts arise because relationship boundaries become blurred. Our purpose is to expose the muddled relationships that can be created between academics and community members in CBPR projects. Drawing upon our experiences presented in a series of vignettes, we consider the nature of these relationships. We explore whether we conduct, in CBPR, good research at the expense of muddling relationships. Despite the potential for muddled relationships, we believe that CBPR is the best approach for research aimed at achieving a more equitable and just society.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Agar M.H., 2008, PROFESSIONAL STRANGE, V2nd
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, COMMUNITY BASED PART
[3]   A Framework for Building Research Partnerships with First Nations Communities [J].
Bharadwaj, Lalita .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INSIGHTS, 2014, 8
[4]  
Blieszner R, 2014, GENERATIONS, V38, P24
[5]   Preliminary field-work: methodological reflections from northern Canadian research [J].
Caine, Ken J. ;
Davison, Colleen M. ;
Stewart, Emma J. .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2009, 9 (04) :489-513
[6]   The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice [J].
Cargo, Margaret ;
Mercer, Shawna L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 29 :325-350
[7]   The power and the promise: Working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes [J].
Cashman, Suzanne B. ;
Adeky, Sarah ;
Allen, Alex J., III ;
Corburn, Jason ;
Israel, Barbara A. ;
Montano, Jaime ;
Rafelito, Alvin ;
Rhodes, Scott D. ;
Swanston, Samara ;
Wallerstein, Nina ;
Eng, Eugenia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 98 (08) :1407-1417
[8]   Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership [J].
Christopher, Suzanne ;
Watts, Vanessa ;
McCormick, Alma Knows His Gun ;
Young, Sara .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 98 (08) :1398-1406
[9]   What is participatory research? [J].
Cornwall, A ;
Jewkes, R .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 41 (12) :1667-1676
[10]  
Daum C., HDB QUALITATIVE RES