Peer Review: a Constantly-Evolving Scientific Process

被引：0
作者：
Soares de Araujo, Claudio Gil [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Gama Filho, Programa Posgrad Ciencias Exercicio & Esporte, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Clin Med Exercicio, CLINIMEX, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
来源：
ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA | 2012年 / 98卷 / 02期
关键词：
Peer Review; Research; Bibliometrics; Periodicals as Topic; MANUSCRIPTS; QUALITY; SCIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：E32 / E35
页数：4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A how-to for peer review [J].
Abbott, Alison .
NATURE, 2011, 473 (7345) :17-17
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Am J Epidemiol, V171, P1249, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwq146
[3]   Peer review, science, young investigators feelings and frustrations [J].
Barbosa Evora, Paulo Roberto ;
Celotto, Andrea Carla .
ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2011, 26 (01) :77-78
[4]   Consensus Science and the Peer Review [J].
Barrio, Jorge R. .
MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 11 (05) :293-293
[5]   How to Peer Review [J].
Christensen, Neil Blair ;
Yokomizo, Akira .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (09) :754-754
[6]   Training for Peer Review [J].
Gough, Nancy R. .
SCIENCE SIGNALING, 2009, 2 (85)
[7]  
Hazlewood Carlton F., 1974, Cardiovasc Dis, V1, P67
[8]   Scientific Research Problems with peer review [J].
Henderson, Mark .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 :c1409
[9]   Something rotten at the core of science? [J].
Horrobin, DF .
TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 22 (02) :51-52
[10]   Measuring the quality of editorial peer review [J].
Jefferson, T ;
Wager, E ;
Davidoff, F .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (21) :2786-2790
123