A repeat dose of misoprostol 800 mcg following mifepristone for outpatient medical abortion at 64-70 and 71-77 days of gestation: A retrospective chart review

被引:17
作者
Dzuba, Ilana G. [1 ]
Castillo, Philicia W. [1 ,5 ]
Bousieguez, Manuel [1 ]
Lugo Hernandez, Elba Margarita [2 ]
Castaneda Vivar, Jose Juan [3 ]
Sanhueza Smith, Patricio [4 ]
机构
[1] Gynu Hlth Projects, 220 E 42nd St,Suite 710, New York, NY 10017 USA
[2] Clin Comunitaria Santa Catarina, Calle Nuevo Leon Mz 38,Lt 9, Mexico City 09698, DF, Mexico
[3] Ctr Salud Beatriz Velasco Aleman, Av Ing Eduardo Molina, Mexico City 15300, DF, Mexico
[4] Secretariat Hlth Mexico City, Dept Reprod Hlth, Calle Altadena 23, Mexico City 03810, DF, Mexico
[5] Guttmacher Inst, 125 Maiden Lane,7th Floor, New York, NY 10038 USA
关键词
Medical abortion; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Mexico; Outpatient; NON-INFERIORITY; MEXICO-CITY; ACCEPTABILITY; REGIMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of outpatient medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and two misoprostol 800 mcg doses at 64-70 and 71-77 days of gestation. Study design: We conducted a retrospective chart review of medical abortion outcomes among clients with 64-77 day gestations at a Mexico City public clinic between February 2014 and November 2016 who took mifepristone 200 mg followed 24-48 h later by two doses of misoprostol 800 mcg four hours apart (first dose buccally, second dose sublingually). The primary outcome was successful medical abortion, defined as pregnancy expulsion without surgical intervention. We also assessed additional management and visits to other facilities. We compared outcomes by gestational age (64-70 vs 71-77 days). Results: Of 602 charts reviewed, we analyzed 232 and 218 in the respective groups for effectiveness; nearly 25% of clients were lost to follow up. Treatment success occurred in 231 (99.6%, 95% CI 97.6-100%) clients at 64-70 days and 213 (97.7%, 95% CI 94.7-99.3%) clients at 71-77 days (p = 0.11). Ongoing pregnancy occurred in 1 (0.4%, 95% CI 0-2.4%) and 3 (1.4%, 95% CI 0.3-4.0%) clients, respectively (p = 0.36). Two charts from the 71-77 days group documented visits to other facilities: one bleeding concern prior to scheduled follow up and a hemorrhage during an aspiration intervention. Conclusions: Regimen effectiveness was high at 64-70 and 71-77 days among clients who attended follow up. However, with 25% attrition, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about effectiveness and associated safety. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 108
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Outpatient medical abortion is safe and effective through 70 days gestation [J].
Abbas, Dina ;
Chong, Erica ;
Raymond, Elizabeth G. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 92 (03) :197-199
[2]   A randomized comparison of medical abortion and surgical vacuum aspiration at 10-13 weeks gestation [J].
Ashok, PW ;
Kidd, A ;
Flett, GMM ;
Fitzmaurice, A ;
Graham, W ;
Templeton, A .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (01) :92-98
[3]   Decriminalization of Abortion in Mexico City: The Effects on Women's Reproductive Rights [J].
Becker, Davida ;
Diaz Olavarrieta, Claudia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (04) :590-593
[4]   Mifepristone followed by home administration of buccal misoprostol for medical abortion up to 70 days of amenorrhoea in a general practice in Curacao [J].
Boersma, Adriana A. ;
Jong, Betty Meyboom-de ;
Kleiverda, Gunilla .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2011, 16 (02) :61-66
[5]   Mifepristone followed in 24 hours to 48 hours by misoprostol for late first-trimester abortion [J].
Bracken, Hillary ;
Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Nhu ;
Schaff, Eric ;
Coyaji, Kurus ;
Ambardekar, Shubha ;
Westheimer, Emily ;
Winikoff, Beverly .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04) :895-901
[6]   A two-pill sublingual misoprostol outpatient regimen following mifepristone for medical abortion through 70 days' LMP: a prospective comparative open-label trial [J].
Bracken, Hillary ;
Dabash, Rasha ;
Tsertsvadze, George ;
Posohova, Svetlana ;
Shah, Milind ;
Hajri, Selma ;
Mundle, Shuchita ;
Chelli, Hela ;
Zeramdini, Dhouha ;
Tsereteli, Tamar ;
Platais, Ingrida ;
Winikoff, Beverly .
CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 89 (03) :181-186
[7]   Mifepristone With Buccal Misoprostol for Medical Abortion A Systematic Review [J].
Chen, Melissa J. ;
Creinin, Mitchell D. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (01) :12-21
[8]  
Cleland K, 2013, OBSTET GYNECOL, V121, P166, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182755763, http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182755763]
[9]   Nurse versus physician-provision of early medical abortion in Mexico: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial [J].
Diaz Olavarrieta, Claudia ;
Ganatra, Bela ;
Sorhaindo, Annik ;
Karver, Tahilin S. ;
Seuc, Armando ;
Villalobos, Aremis ;
Garcia, Sandra G. ;
Perez, Martha ;
Bousieguez, Manuel ;
Sanhueza, Patricio .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2015, 93 (04) :249-258
[10]   A non-inferiority study of outpatient mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion at 64-70 days and 71-77 days of gestation [J].
Dzuba, Ilana G. ;
Chong, Erica ;
Hannum, Curtiss ;
Lichtenberg, E. Steve ;
Lugo Hernandez, Elba Margarita ;
Nguyen Thi Nhu Ngoc ;
Patel, Ashlesha ;
Rzayeva, Gulnara ;
Sanhueza Smith, Patricio ;
Tsertsvadze, George ;
Winikoff, Beverly .
CONTRACEPTION, 2020, 101 (05) :302-308