Does visualization affect monitoring accuracy, restudy choice, and comprehension scores of students in primary education?

被引:16
作者
Kostons, Danny [1 ]
de Koning, Bjorn B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Groningen Inst Educ Res, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Social & Behav Sci, Dept Psychol Educ & Child Studies, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Text comprehension; Monitoring; Selection; Visual representation; IMPROVES METACOMPREHENSION; CHILDRENS COMPREHENSION; CONSTRUCTIVE PROCESSES; READING-COMPREHENSION; TEXT COMPREHENSION; SELF-REGULATION; CUE; STRATEGIES; JUDGMENTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.05.001
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
In the present study, we investigated how 116 fourth and fifth grade students' monitoring skills were associated with restudy choices and explored whether drawing was a useful intervention to improve monitoring accuracy, restudy choice, and comprehension scores. During the first session, all students read a text, judged their learning of the information within that text, selected paragraphs to reread, reread those parts, and then made another judgment of learning (JOL) before doing a post-test. Several significant correlations were found between the various variables involved, such as higher JOLs before rereading related to fewer paragraphs being reread, and JOL-accuracy after rereading was positively correlated with the scores on the postreading questions. For the second session, students were split-up into three conditions: a control condition and two drawing conditions. In the long-drawing condition, students were allowed to draw throughout the whole second session, including post-test. In the brief drawing condition participants only got to draw the first time they read the second text. We did not find significant differences on the postreading scores. The only differences we found were that the participants in the long drawing group were more accurate in their JOLs before rereading and selected more paragraphs to reread than the other two groups, and invested more mental effort in comparison to the other groups. Drawing more elements was positively correlated with the posttest scores and JOLs, whereas drawing more details was negatively correlated with posttest scores and did not correlate with JOLs. As students in the long drawing condition drew both more elements but also created more detail in those drawings compared to the short drawing condition, it is possible that the beneficial effects of creating drawings were cancelled out by the negative effects. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Drawing to Learn in Science
    Ainsworth, Shaaron
    Prain, Vaughan
    Tytler, Russell
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 333 (6046) : 1096 - 1097
  • [2] A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects
    Alexander, PA
    Graham, S
    Harris, KR
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 10 (02) : 129 - 154
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition
  • [4] Bjork RA, 1999, ATTENTION PERFORM, V17, P435
  • [5] Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions
    Bjork, Robert A.
    Dunlosky, John
    Kornell, Nate
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 : 417 - +
  • [6] Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge
    Cain, K
    Oakhill, JV
    Barnes, MA
    Bryant, PE
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (06) : 850 - 859
  • [7] Cain K., 1990, BRIT J EDUC PSYCHOL, V76, P697
  • [8] The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization
    Chang, KE
    Sung, YT
    Chen, ID
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2002, 71 (01) : 5 - 23
  • [9] CHI MTH, 1994, COGNITIVE SCI, V18, P439, DOI 10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7
  • [10] Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]