Geriatric Assessment Can Predict Outcomes of Endoscopic Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Elderly Patients

被引:12
作者
Pichon, Thomas [1 ]
Lebdai, Souhil [1 ]
Launay, Cyrille Patrice [2 ]
Collet, Nadine [3 ]
Chautard, Denis [1 ]
Cerruti, Arnaud [1 ]
Hoarau, Nicolas [1 ]
Brassart, Elena [1 ]
Bigot, Pierre [1 ]
Beauchet, Olivier [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Azzouzi, Abdel-Rahmene [1 ]
Culty, Thibaut [1 ]
机构
[1] Angers Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, 4 Rue Larrey, F-49933 Angers 09, France
[2] Angers Univ Hosp, Div Geriatr Med, Dept Neurosci, Angers, France
[3] Haut Anjou Hosp, Dept Geriatr Med, Chateau Gontier, France
[4] McGill Univ, Div Geriatr Med, Dept Med, Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish Gen Hosp, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Lady Davis Inst Med Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Dr Joseph Kaufmann Chair Geriatr Med, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
prostatic hyperplasia; transurethral resection of prostate; laser therapy; aged; geriatric assessment; urinary retention; ACUTE URINARY RETENTION; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; PROSTATECTOMY; MORBIDITY; 80-YEAR-OLD; MORTALITY; FAILURE; SAFE; AGE;
D O I
10.1089/end.2017.0325
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Ojectives: Surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in elderly patients is associated with higher morbidity and mortality rate. This raises the question of benefice and risk balance. We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate the results of endoscopic surgery for BPH in elderly patients, according to geriatric assessment. Patients and Methods: We included prospectively 60 patients older than 75 years, with an indwelling catheter for acute or chronic retention, who were candidates to endoscopic surgery for BPH. Patients underwent the brief geriatric assessment (BGA) and the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to classify them into three groups: vigorous, vulnerable, and sick. Success was defined by the bladder catheter withdrawal after surgery. Results: After geriatric assessment, 33 patients were classified in the vigorous group (55%), 25 in the vulnerable group (42%), and 2 in the sick group (3%). The success rate immediately after surgery was 85% and 41% in the vigorous patient group and the vulnerable and sick patient group, respectively (p<0.05). The success rate at 3 months after surgery was 94% and 55% (p<0.05). The morbidity was higher for the vulnerable and sick group (44%) compared with the vigorous group (15%) (p<0.05). The BGA also allowed predicting a higher risk of failure in patients with a score 3 immediately after surgery (odds ratio 5.9, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.61, 29.9) and 3 months after surgery (odds ratio 6.9, 95% CI 1.31, 70.8). Conclusion: Geriatric assessment can predict the outcome of endoscopic surgery for BPH for patients in retention older than 75 years. Vulnerable and sick patients had a higher risk to keep their indwelling catheter after the surgery compared with vigorous patients. The complication rate is also higher. The BGA can although predict a poor result of surgery when its score is equal or above 3/6.
引用
收藏
页码:1195 / 1202
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Mortality in men admitted to hospital with acute urinary retention: database analysis
    Armitage, James N.
    Sibanda, Nokuthaba
    Cathcart, Paul J.
    Emberton, Mark
    van der Meulen, Jan H. P.
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7631): : 1199 - +
  • [2] Brierly RD, 2001, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V83, P50
  • [3] Desgrippes A, 1998, Prog Urol, V8, P321
  • [4] Urodynamic assessment of patients with acute urinary retention: Is treatment failure after prostatectomy predictable?
    Djavan, B
    Madersbacher, S
    Klingler, C
    Marberger, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (05) : 1829 - 1833
  • [5] Management of prostate cancer in older patients: updated recommendations of a working group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology
    Droz, Jean-Pierre
    Aapro, Matti
    Balducci, Lodovico
    Boyle, Helen
    Van den Broeck, Thomas
    Cathcart, Paul
    Dickinson, Louise
    Efstathiou, Eleni
    Emberton, Mark
    Fitzpatrick, John M.
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Hughes, Simon
    Joniau, Steven
    Kattan, Michael
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Oudard, Stephane
    Payne, Heather
    Saad, Fred
    Sugihara, Toru
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (09) : E404 - E414
  • [6] Acute urinary retention: defining the need and timing for pressure-flow studies
    Dubey, D
    Kumar, A
    Kapoor, R
    Srivastava, A
    Mandhani, A
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (03) : 178 - 181
  • [7] Very high residual volumes should not prevent transurethral resection of the prostate being offered to men presenting with urinary retention
    Green, William
    Campain, Nick
    Peracha, Amjad
    Ratan, Hari
    Walton, Thomas
    Parkinson, Richard
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 48 (06) : 549 - 553
  • [8] URINARY RETENTION IN THE ELDERLY - A STUDY OF 100 HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS
    GROSSHANS, C
    PASSADORI, Y
    PETER, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1993, 41 (06) : 633 - 638
  • [9] Developing a strategy to reduce the high morbidity of patients with long-term urinary catheters: the BioMed catheter research clinic
    Khan, Azhar A.
    Mathur, Sunil
    Feneley, Roger
    Timoney, Anthony G.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 100 (06) : 1298 - 1301
  • [10] Khan Masha, 2005, JPMA Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, V55, P20