Development and initial validation of a heart disease knowledge questionnaire for people with rheumatoid arthritis

被引:21
作者
John, Holly [1 ,2 ]
Treharne, Gareth J. [1 ,3 ]
Hale, Elizabeth D. [1 ,2 ]
Panoulas, Vasileios F. [1 ,4 ]
Carroll, Douglas [2 ]
Kitas, George D. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dudley Grp, Dept Rheumatol, Dudley, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Sport & Exercise Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, Dunedin, New Zealand
[4] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, GR-45110 Ioannina, Greece
[5] Univ Manchester, Arc Epidemiol Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Rheumatoid arthritis; Cardiovascular disease; Questionnaire; Psychometric validation; Patient education; PATIENT KNOWLEDGE; RISK; CARE; PKQ;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.014
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop and validate two parallel versions of the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire-Rheumatoid Arthritis (HDFQ-RA), a modified and RA-specific version of the HDFQ. Methods: The questionnaire was composed of genetic questions from the original HDFQ with additional RA-specific questions added. Cognitive interviewing was performed and the questionnaire piloted to generate two parallel questionnaires. For psychometric validation, 130 patients with RA completed the questionnaires at baseline and 2 weeks later. Results: Parallel form reliability of both questionnaires was established: the median score for both questionnaires was 9/13 with no statistical difference in scores. Kuder-Richardson-20 formula was 0.65 and 0.67 for both questionnaires. Test-retest stability showed constant median scores of 9/13 and no statistical difference in scores between baseline and follow-up. Known groups comparison revealed that patients who had self-educated themselves about heart disease, or who were taking CVD medications, had significantly higher scores on the questionnaires. Conclusion: The two parallel forms of the HDFQ-RA have been shown to be equivalent measures of CVD knowledge and evidence supporting their reliability and validity is presented. Practice implications: The HDFQ-RA is an appropriate tool for application in clinical and research settings, e.g., assessing novel educational interventions or tracking participants' progress on an education course. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 143
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条