Offshore wind farm layout optimization regarding wake effects and electrical losses

被引:46
|
作者
Amaral, Luis [1 ]
Castro, Rui [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, INESC, ID IST, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Offshore wind energy; Electrical losses; Wake effect; Genetic Algorithm; Particle Swarm Optimization; GENETIC ALGORITHM; PARTICLE SWARM; TURBINES; DESIGN; ENERGY; PLACEMENT; EUROPE; SYSTEM; SPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2017.01.010
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A major development of the offshore wind energy market is being witnessed. Since the implicated costs are considerably high, it is extremely important to ensure that the energy production is maximum, so that the costs per energy unit are minimized. Thus, the turbines should be strategically positioned to extract as much energy as possible from the wind, considering wake effect losses, as well as internal grid electrical losses. In order to avoid turbines to be placed in unrealistic positions, they should be distributed according to a grid of rectangular shaped cells; each of these is divided in multiple sub-cells. The problem of finding the turbines optimal position among the pre-defined sub-cells so that maximum annual energy is produced could be addressed using a deterministic approach. However, the problem becomes unfeasible when the number of turbines and/or the number of sub-cells increase. To overcome this difficulty, optimization techniques should be used. Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization are approached in this paper. This paper deals with the wind park layout optimization problem. A methodology to position the turbines inside a wind park so that the annual energy production is maximum is proposed. The results proved that the meta-heuristic method is much more CPU time efficient in providing the maximum annual year production as compared to the traditional deterministic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Layout optimization for renovation of operational offshore wind farm based on machine learning wake model
    Yang, Kun
    Deng, Xiaowei
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2023, 232
  • [12] Optimization of offshore wind farm layout in restricted zones
    Hou, Peng
    Hu, Weihao
    Chen, Cong
    Soltani, Mohsen
    Chen, Zhe
    ENERGY, 2016, 113 : 487 - 496
  • [13] An Analytical Framework for Offshore Wind Farm Layout Optimization
    Lackner, Matthew
    Elkinton, Christopher
    WIND ENGINEERING, 2007, 31 (01) : 17 - 31
  • [14] A NOVEL WAKE INTERACTION MODEL FOR WIND FARM LAYOUT OPTIMIZATION
    Kuo, Jim Y. J.
    Romero, David A.
    Amon, Cristina H.
    ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2014, VOL 6B, 2015,
  • [15] Offshore wind farm layout optimization using particle swarm optimization
    Pillai A.C.
    Chick J.
    Johanning L.
    Khorasanchi M.
    Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy, 2018, 4 (01) : 73 - 88
  • [16] Wind Farm Layout Optimization with a Novel Gaussian Wake Model
    Tao, Siyu
    Xu, Qingshan
    Zhou, Changcheng
    Zhou, Jiemin
    Zheng, Gang
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY (ICIT), 2019, : 718 - 723
  • [17] DC Collection System Layout Optimization for Offshore Wind Farm
    Tahery, Hamid
    Kucuksari, Sadik
    2020 IEEE/PES TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION (T&D), 2020,
  • [18] Offshore wind farm layout optimization using ensemble methods
    Eikrem, Kjersti Solberg
    Lorentzen, Rolf Johan
    Faria, Ricardo
    Stordal, Andreas Storksen
    Godard, Alexandre
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 216
  • [19] Grid Optimization for Offshore Wind Farm Layout and Substation Location
    Moon, Won-Sik
    Kim, Jae-Chul
    Jo, Ara
    Won, Jong-Nam
    2014 IEEE TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE AND EXPO (ITEC) ASIA-PACIFIC 2014, 2014,
  • [20] Offshore Wind Farm Layout Optimization via Differential Evolution
    Osuna-Enciso, Valentin
    Espinoza-Haro, J. Israel
    Oliva, Diego
    Hernandez-Ahuactzi, Iran F.
    COMPUTACION Y SISTEMAS, 2018, 22 (03): : 929 - 941