The Relationship between Decision-Making and Intolerance to Uncertainty, Cognitive Flexibility and Happiness

被引:12
作者
Yildiz, Meltem [1 ]
Eldeleklioglu, Jale [2 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Uludag Univ, Fac Educ, Bursa, Turkey
[2] Bursa Uludag Univ, Univ Fac Educ, Bursa, Turkey
来源
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH | 2021年 / 91期
关键词
Self-Esteem in Decision-Making; Decision-Making Styles; Intolerance to Uncertainty; Cognitive Flexibility; the Level of Happiness; POSITIVE AFFECT; RISK; EMOTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; TOLERANCE; ANXIETY; RELIABILITY; ADAPTATION; INSTRUMENT; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.14689/ejer.2021.91.3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose: In this study, the relationship between university students' self-esteem in decision-making and decision-making styles and intolerance to uncertainty, cognitive flexibility and the level of happiness were investigated. Research Methods: The study was conducted on 349 university students (69% female, 31% male) between the ages of 17-25 (average age 20.42). In this study, the Melbourne Decision Scale, the Intolerance to Uncertainty Scale, the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory and the Oxford Happiness Scale-Short Form were used to measure self-esteem in decision-making and decision-making styles and intolerance to uncertainty, cognitive flexibility and the level of happiness. Findings: Calculated correlations showed that there were significant relationships between university students' self-esteem in decision-making and decision-making styles and intolerance to uncertainty, cognitive flexibility and the level of happiness and were significantly predicted by the variables of intolerance to uncertainty, cognitive flexibility and happiness. Implications for Research and Practice: Suggestions for researchers are as follows: it is possible to say that the following themes can be further studied: the decision-making styles and self-esteem in decision-making concepts in different age groups and education levels; and identifying different variables related to these concepts and increasing the number of studies conducted with experimental arrangements involving different decision-making situations. For practitioners, seminars can be organized on this issue within the youth counseling centers working on the university campuses, organizing psycho-education programs for the development of young people's decision-making skills and emphasizing the importance of cognition in decision-making in these programs, as well as emphasizing emotions and uncertainty. (C) 2021 Ani Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 59
页数:22
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Akinci T. Dogan, 2011, TURK PSIKOL DANISMA, V4, P165
[2]  
Alver B., 2005, Mugla Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, V14, P19
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, EAT WEIGHT DISORD-ST, DOI DOI 10.1007/s40519-016-0331-3
[5]   THE ROLE OF POTENTIAL LOSS IN THE INFLUENCE OF AFFECT ON RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR [J].
ARKES, HR ;
HERREN, LT ;
ISEN, AM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1988, 42 (02) :181-193
[6]   Testing a Hierarchical Model of Distress Tolerance [J].
Bardeen, Joseph R. ;
Fergus, Thomas A. ;
Orcutt, Holly K. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2013, 35 (04) :495-505
[7]   COGNITIVE CHANGE, STRATEGIC ACTION, AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENEWAL [J].
BARR, PS ;
STIMPERT, JL ;
HUFF, AS .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1992, 13 :15-36
[8]  
Bilgic R., 2016, Usak Universitesi Egitim Arastirmalari Dergisi, V2, P39, DOI [10.29065/usakead.232432, DOI 10.29065/USAKEAD.232432]
[9]   MOOD AND MEMORY [J].
BOWER, GH .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1981, 36 (02) :129-148
[10]   The intolerance of uncertainty scale: psychometric properties of the English version [J].
Buhr, K ;
Dugas, MJ .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2002, 40 (08) :931-945