Comparison of Vancomycin Treatment Failures for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Stratified by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

被引:2
|
作者
Wingler, Mary Joyce B. [1 ]
Childress, Darrell T. [1 ]
Maldonado, Ricardo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] East Alabama Med Ctr, Opelika, AL USA
关键词
infectious disease; bacterial infections; vancomycin; therapeutic monitoring; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; MRSA BACTEREMIA; INFECTIONS; DAPTOMYCIN; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1177/8755122519852679
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Optimal treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremias (MRSABs) with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) high within the susceptible range is of concern due to the high rate of mortality and increased prevalence. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate vancomycin treatment failures in patients with MRSAB stratified by vancomycin MIC. Methods: In this retrospective chart review, patients >= 19 years of age with MRSAB between July 2010 and December 2016 were included if they received intravenous vancomycin for >= 72 hours. Vancomycin treatment failures were compared between patients with vancomycin MICs of <= 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L. Vancomycin treatment failure was defined as microbiological failure at 7 days. Inpatient mortality, 30-day readmission, vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity, and early bacteremia clearance at 48 to 96 hours were assessed as secondary endpoints. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the vancomycin MIC <= 1 mg/L group and 22 patients in the vancomycin MIC 2 mg/L group. No significant difference was found in vancomycin treatment failures at 7 days between groups (88% vs 91%, respectively; P = .850). At 96 hours, there was no significant difference in vancomycin treatment failures between groups (72% vs 90%, respectively; P = .127). No significant difference was found in mortality (P > .99) or 30-day readmission (P > .99). Conclusions: In this study, vancomycin treatment failures were not more prevalent in patients with vancomycin MIC of 2 mg/L at 7 days. Regardless of MIC, antibiotics should be switched to an alternative agent at 7 days for persistent bacteremia.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 207
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Relationships between vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration, dosing strategies, and outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Clemens, Evan C.
    Chan, Jeannie D.
    Lynch, John B.
    Dellit, Timothy H.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2011, 71 (04) : 408 - 414
  • [2] Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Matters
    Deresinski, Stan
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 54 (06) : 772 - 774
  • [3] Impact of area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio on vancomycin treatment outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia
    Song, Kyoung-Ho
    Kim, Hong Bin
    Kim, Hyung-sook
    Lee, Myung Jin
    Jung, Younghee
    Kim, Gayeon
    Hwang, Jeong-Hwan
    Kim, Nak-Hyun
    Kim, Moonsuk
    Kim, Chung-Jong
    Choe, Pyoeng Gyun
    Chung, Jae-Yong
    Park, Wan Beom
    Kim, Eu Suk
    Park, Kyoung Un
    Kim, Nam Joong
    Kim, Eui-Chong
    Oh, Myoung-don
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2015, 46 (06) : 689 - 695
  • [4] Evaluation of the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
    Usery, Justin B.
    Vo, Ngan H.
    Finch, Christopher K.
    Cleveland, Kerry O.
    Gelfand, Michael S.
    Self, Timothy H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 349 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [5] Early Use of Daptomycin Versus Vancomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia With Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration &gt;1 mg/L: A Matched Cohort Study
    Murray, Kyle P.
    Zhao, Jing J.
    Davis, Susan L.
    Kullar, Ravina
    Kaye, Keith S.
    Lephart, Paul
    Rybak, Michael J.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 56 (11) : 1562 - 1569
  • [6] The ratio of pre-dialysis vancomycin trough serum concentration to minimum inhibitory concentration is associated with treatment outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Fu, Chien-Fang
    Huang, Jiun-Da
    Wang, Jann-Tay
    Lin, Shu-Wen
    Wu, Chien-Chih
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [7] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in hemodialysis and nondialysis patients
    Kan, Li-Ping
    Lin, Jung-Chung
    Chiu, Sheng-Kang
    Yeh, Yen-Cheng
    Lin, Te-Yu
    Yang, Ya-Sung
    Wang, Yung-Chih
    Wang, Ning-Chi
    Yeh, Kuo-Ming
    Chang, Feng-Yee
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2014, 47 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Daptomycin versus Vancomycin for Bacteremia Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration &gt; 1 μg/mL: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Samura, Masaru
    Kitahiro, Yuki
    Tashiro, Sho
    Moriyama, Hiromu
    Hamamura, Yuna
    Takahata, Isamu
    Kawabe, Rina
    Enoki, Yuki
    Taguchi, Kazuaki
    Takesue, Yoshio
    Matsumoto, Kazuaki
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [9] Area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio as a predictor of vancomycin treatment outcome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia
    Jung, Younghee
    Song, Kyoung-Ho
    Cho, Jeong eun
    Kim, Hyung-sook
    Kim, Nak-Hyun
    Kim, Taek Soo
    Choe, Pyoeng Gyun
    Chung, Jae-Yong
    Park, Wan Beom
    Bang, Ji Hwan
    Kim, Eu Suk
    Park, Kyoung Un
    Park, Sang-Won
    Kim, Hong Bin
    Kim, Nam Joong
    Oh, Myoung-don
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2014, 43 (02) : 179 - 183
  • [10] Reporting elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: consensus by an International Working Group
    Wilcox, Mark
    Al-Obeid, Suleiman
    Gales, Ana
    Kozlov, Roman
    Martinez-Orozco, Jose A.
    Rossi, Flavia
    Sidorenko, Sergey
    Blondeau, Joseph
    FUTURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 14 (04) : 345 - 352