Automatic Subtyping of Individuals with Primary Progressive Aphasia

被引:23
作者
Themistocleous, Charalambos [1 ]
Ficek, Bronte [1 ]
Webster, Kimberly [1 ]
den Ouden, Dirk-Bart [2 ]
Hillis, Argye E. [1 ]
Tsapkini, Kyrana [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
Classification; machine learning; natural language processing; primary progressive aphasia; NEURAL-NETWORKS; CLASSIFICATION; SPEECH;
D O I
10.3233/JAD-201101
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: The classification of patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) into variants is time-consuming, costly, and requires combined expertise by clinical neurologists, neuropsychologists, speech pathologists, and radiologists. Objective: The aim of the present study is to determine whether acoustic and linguistic variables provide accurate classification of PPA patients into one of three variants: nonfluent PPA, semantic PPA, and logopenic PPA. Methods: In this paper, we present a machine learning model based on deep neural networks (DNN) for the subtyping of patients with PPA into three main variants, using combined acoustic and linguistic information elicited automatically via acoustic and linguistic analysis. The performance of the DNN was compared to the classification accuracy of Random Forests, Support Vector Machines, and Decision Trees, as well as to expert clinicians' classifications. Results: The DNN model outperformed the other machine learning models as well as expert clinicians' classifications with 80% classification accuracy. Importantly, 90% of patients with nfvPPA and 95% of patients with 1vPPA was identified correctly, providing reliable subtyping of these patients into their corresponding PPA variants. Conclusion: We show that the combined speech and language markers from connected speech productions can inform variant subtyping in patients with PPA. The end-to-end automated machine learning approach we present can enable clinicians and researchers to provide an easy, quick, and inexpensive classification of patients with PPA.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1194
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abadi M, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF OSDI'16: 12TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, P265
[2]   Logopenic and Nonfluent Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia Are Differentiated by Acoustic Measures of Speech Production [J].
Ballard, Kirrie J. ;
Savage, Sharon ;
Leyton, Cristian E. ;
Vogel, Adam P. ;
Hornberger, Michael ;
Hodges, John R. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02)
[3]  
Boersma P., 1992, Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.24) [Computer software]
[4]  
Breiman L., 2001, IEEE Trans. Broadcast., V45, P5
[5]  
Bridle J.S., 1989, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, VVolume 2, P211, DOI DOI 10.5555/2969830
[6]  
Chollet F., 2018, Deep Learning With Python
[7]  
CORTES C, 1995, MACH LEARN, V20, P273, DOI 10.1023/A:1022627411411
[8]   Describing Phonological Paraphasias in Three Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia [J].
Dalton, Sarah Grace Hudspeth ;
Shultz, Christine ;
Henry, Maya L. ;
Hillis, Argye E. ;
Richardson, Jessica D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2018, 27 (01) :336-349
[9]   A survey on the application of recurrent neural networks to statistical language modeling [J].
De Mulder, Wim ;
Bethard, Steven ;
Moens, Marie-Francine .
COMPUTER SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2015, 30 (01) :61-98
[10]   Neurological impressions on the organization of language networks in the human brain [J].
de Oliveira, Fabricio Ferreira ;
Correia Marin, Sheilla de Medeiros ;
Ferreira Bertolucci, Paulo Henrique .
BRAIN INJURY, 2017, 31 (02) :140-150