COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ANTIFUNGAL TREATMENT REGIMENS FOR EXPERIMENTAL CANDIDA ENDOPHTHALMITIS IN RABBIT MODELS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment options of experimental in-vivo Candida endophthalmitis. For inoculation, a 0.1 ml of suspension of Candida albicans was injected into the vitreous of the right eye of each New Zealand rabbit. On the 15(th) day, the clinical evaluation for the resultant endophthalmitis was noted, and vitreous samples were obtained. On the 21(st) day, culture positive eyes were divided into four groups in terms of treatment modalities. Group 1 (n = 7) received intravitreal amphotericin B injection, group 2 (n = 8) received both intravitreal dexamethasone and amphotericin B injections, group 3 (n = 8) underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and amphotericin B injection, and group 4 (n = 8) underwent PPV and both amphotericin B and silicone oil injections. The vitreous samples obtained from right eyes of the rabbits on the 15(th) day, were all culture positive for Candida albicans. On the 35(th) day, the least colony counts (colony forming unit) were present in eyes that received only intravitreal amphotericin B injection in group 1, followed by group 4 that underwent PPV and both amphotericin B and silicone oil injections. In Candida endophthalmitis, intravitreal injection of amphotericin B without steroid appears to be the primary choice of therapy. In cases who fail to respond to this regimen alone, PPV in combination with silicone oil injection may be considered. Benefit-risk ratio should be cautiously interpreted for application of intravitreal steroid injection.