The barely revealed preference behind road investment priorities

被引:37
作者
Fridstrom, L
Elvik, R
机构
[1] Institute of Transport Economics,
关键词
public roads; investment; revealed preference; cost-benefit; logit model;
D O I
10.1023/A:1004954816965
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An attempt is made to reveal the preference of decision makers within the regional Norwegian public roads administration. The order of priority assigned to the respective, competing public road investment opportunities within the various counties (provinces) is studied by means of a rank order multinomial logit model. Explanatory variables used include cost, benefit, and a variety of attributes characterizing the individual investment projects. Although statistically significant, cost and benefit appear to be of only marginal importance for the priorities set. More weight is attached to cost than to benefit. Smaller projects are preferred to larger, given the benefit-cost ratio. In general, the models estimated are able to explain only a relatively small share of the priority setting made.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 168
页数:24
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand
[2]   EXPLOITING RANK ORDERED CHOICE SET DATA WITHIN THE STOCHASTIC UTILITY MODEL [J].
CHAPMAN, RG ;
STAELIN, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1982, 19 (03) :288-301
[3]   Explaining the distribution of State funds for national road investments between counties in Norway: Engineering standards or vote trading? [J].
Elvik, R .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 1995, 85 (3-4) :371-388
[4]  
ELVIKR, 1993, 175 I TRANSP EC
[5]  
JANSSON JO, 1989, EKONOMISK DEBATT, P85
[6]  
LIAN JI, 1995, 998 I TRANSP EC
[7]   REVEALED PREFERENCES OF A GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY - EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE [J].
MCFADDEN, D .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1976, 7 (01) :55-72
[8]   REVEALED PREFERENCES OF A GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY - THEORY [J].
MCFADDEN, D .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1975, 6 (02) :401-416
[9]  
McFadden Daniel, 1978, Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models
[10]  
Nilsson J.-E, 1991, J TRANSP ECON POLICY, V10, P163