Comparison of rectangular and dual-planar positron emission mammography scanners

被引:35
作者
Qi, JY [1 ]
Kuo, C [1 ]
Huesman, RH [1 ]
Klein, GJ [1 ]
Moses, WW [1 ]
Reutter, BW [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Ctr Funct Imaging, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Fisher information; lesion detection; positron emission mammography (PEM); quantitation;
D O I
10.1109/TNS.2002.803810
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Breast imaging using dedicated positron emission tomography (PEM) has gained much interest in the medical imaging field. In this paper, we compare the performance between a rectangular geometry and a parallel dual-planar geometry. Both geometries are studied with depth of interaction (DOI) detectors and non-DOI detectors. We compare the Fisher-information matrix, lesion detection, and quantitation of the four systems. The lesion detectability is measured by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of a prewhitening numerical observer for detecting a known hot spot on a uniform background. Results show that the rectangular system with DOI has the highest SNR for the detection task and the lowest bias at any given noise level for the quantitation task. They also show that for small simulated lesions the parallel dual-planar system with DOI detectors outperforms the rectangular system with non-DOI detectors, while the rectangular system with non-DOI detectors can outperform the parallel dual-planar system with DOI detectors for large simulated lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:2089 / 2096
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions [J].
Barrett, HH ;
Abbey, CK ;
Clarkson, E .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1998, 15 (06) :1520-1535
[2]   OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY .2. FISHER INFORMATION, FOURIER CROSSTALK, AND FIGURES OF MERIT FOR TASK-PERFORMANCE [J].
BARRETT, HH ;
DENNY, JL ;
WAGNER, RF ;
MYERS, KJ .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1995, 12 (05) :834-852
[3]   OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY - EFFECTS OF QUANTUM NOISE AND OBJECT VARIABILITY [J].
BARRETT, HH .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1990, 7 (07) :1266-1278
[4]   Design and evaluation of an LSO PET detector for breast cancer imaging [J].
Doshi, NK ;
Shao, YP ;
Silverman, RW ;
Cherry, SR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (07) :1535-1543
[5]   Dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging [J].
Freifelder, R ;
Karp, JS .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (12) :2463-2480
[6]   List-mode maximum-likelihood reconstruction applied to positron emission mammography (PEM) with irregular sampling [J].
Huesman, RH ;
Klein, GJ ;
Moses, WW ;
Qi, JY ;
Reutter, BW ;
Virador, PRG .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (05) :532-537
[7]   ROOM-TEMPERATURE LSO PIN PHOTODIODE PET DETECTOR MODULE THAT MEASURES DEPTH OF INTERACTION [J].
MOSES, WW ;
DERENZO, SE ;
MELCHER, CL ;
MANENTE, RA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1995, 42 (04) :1085-1089
[8]  
Pani R, 1997, ANTICANCER RES, V17, P1645
[9]  
QI J, 2001, P IEEE NUCL SCI S ME, P2248
[10]   Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET [J].
Qi, JY ;
Leahy, RM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (05) :493-506