Is the economic and social cost of one-stage bilateral hip resurfacing lower than two-stage procedures? Retrospective case-control study of 260 hips

被引:1
作者
Hoestlandt, Antoine [1 ,3 ]
Dartus, Julien [1 ,3 ]
Delay, Cyril [1 ,3 ]
Martinot, Pierre [1 ,3 ]
Girard, Julien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille Nord France, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille 2, Dept Med Sport, Fac Med Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] CHU Lille, Hop Salengro, Serv Orthoped, Pl Verdun, F-59000 Lille, France
关键词
Hip resurfacing; Bilateral; Cost analysis; One-stage versus two-stage; ARTHROPLASTY; REPLACEMENT; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2020.01.011
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Studies on the economic impact of medical practices and estimates of intra- and extra-hospital costs have an important role in controlling healthcare spending. But few studies of this nature have been done for bilateral surgery in a single operative session. This led us to carry out a health economics study to determine whether (1) bilateral hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) performed in one stage instead of two stages will reduce the health care expenditures (costs of hospitalization, medical leave, rehabilitation), (2) it is equally safe for the patient. Hypothesis One-stage bilateral HRA is less costly for the health care system than two-stage bilateral resurfacing. Methods: This was a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective cohort study comparing patients who underwent bilateral HRA in one stage (53 cases) or in two stages (77 cases). We determined the intra-hospital costs based on the French National Cost Scales and the extra-hospital costs (medical leave and rehabilitation), perioperative data (blood loss, operation time, duration of narcotic analgesic use, medical and surgical complications) and the outcomes with a mean follow-up of 4.8 years [1.7-10.1]. Results: The total costs for the one-stage group ((sic)16,840.94 +/- 7042.7) were significantly less than those of the two-stage group ((sic)19335.0 +/- 7296.9) (p = 0.0101). The two groups were comparable except for the one-stage group having more primary hip osteoarthritis indications (72% (38/53)) than the two-stage group (49% (38/77)) (p = 0.0111). The main differences between groups was the cost and duration of hospitalization, with cost of (sic)10,546.06 +/- 2049.47 and average length of stay (ALS) of 9.83 +/- 2.19 days in the one-stage group and (sic)13,569.49 +/- 2186.30, ALS = 15.04 +/- 3.15 days in the two-stage group (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the length of medical leave: 67.15 +/- 50.36 (0-180) days for the one-stage group and 97.89 +/- 108.39 (0-730) days for the two-stage group (p= 0.1933). Conclusion: Performing bilateral HRA during a single hospital stay results in lower health care expenditures than performing it during two separate hospital stays. Similar studies on other surgical procedures could help to promote the simultaneous nature of bilateral procedures and reset the current pricing, which is currently too low in the French health care system. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 542
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Simultaneous bilateral hip replacement reveals superior outcome and fewer complications than two-stage procedures: a prospective study including 1819 patients and 5801 follow-ups from a total joint replacement registry
    Aghayev, Emin
    Beck, Andreas
    Staub, Lukas P.
    Dietrich, Daniel
    Melloh, Markus
    Orljanski, Weniamin
    Roeder, Christoph
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2010, 11
  • [2] Hip resurfacing for osteonecrosis TWO- TO 18-YEAR RESULTS OF THE CONSERVE PLUS DESIGN AND TECHNIQUE
    Amstutz, H. C.
    Le Duff, M. J.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (07) : 901 - 909
  • [3] Are There Benefits to One- versus Two-stage Procedures in Bilateral Hip Resurfacing?
    Amstutz, Harlan C.
    Su, Edwin P.
    Le Duff, Michel J.
    Fowble, Vincent A.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (06) : 1627 - 1634
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1941, Anesth, DOI [10.1097/00000542-194105000-00004, DOI 10.1097/00000542-194105000-00004]
  • [5] Unilateral versus bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A registry study on survival and risk factors
    Boyer, Bertrand
    Bordini, Barbara
    Caputo, Dalila
    Neri, Thomas
    Stea, Susanna
    Toni, Aldo
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2019, 105 (04) : 627 - 631
  • [6] Do the Potential Benefits of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Justify the Increased Cost and Risk of Complications?
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    Pui, Christine M.
    Ludeman, Matthew J.
    Vail, Thomas P.
    Silverstein, Marc D.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (09) : 2301 - 2312
  • [7] Cabinet du ministere des affaires sociales et de la sante, 2016, COMPT SEC SOC RES 20
  • [8] Caton J, 2012, TYPOLOGIE EPIDEMIOLO, V11
  • [9] Stakes and methods in economic evaluation
    Dervaux, B.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (02) : 141 - 142
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness model comparing dual-mobility to fixed-bearing designs for total hip replacement in France
    Epinette, J. -A.
    Lafuma, A.
    Robert, J.
    Doz, M.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (02) : 143 - 148