Does Preoperative Symptom Duration Impact Clinical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Setting?

被引:5
|
作者
Nie, James W. [1 ]
Hartman, Timothy J. [1 ]
MacGregor, Keith R. [1 ]
Oyetayo, Omolabake O. [1 ]
Zheng, Eileen [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Ambulatory; Inpatient; MCID; MIS-TLIF; Outpatient; PROMs; Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion; ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; SURGERY; PAIN; ASSOCIATION; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.055
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The effect of prolonged symptom duration in patients undergoing ambulatory MIS-TLIF on postoperative clinical outcomes has not been well studied. We aim to compare symptom duration of pain and/or weakness on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing outpatient MIS-TLIF. METHODS: Patients undergoing outpatient MIS-TLIF were gathered in a single-surgeon database. Exclusion criteria were patients missing onset of symptoms, date of surgery, or diagnosis of malignancy, trauma, or infection. Patients were grouped by symptoms <1 year or symptoms >= 1 year. Propensity score matching for demographics was utilized. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated by comparing change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to previously established values. Inferential statistics for demographics, perioperative characteristics, PROMs, and MCID were utilized to compare between groups and/or postoperative improvement. RESULTS: After matching, there were a total of 56 patients, with 30 patients with symptoms <1-year. The <1-year cohort reported significant improvement in all time points in VAS back/leg and 12-week/6-months in ODI. The >= 1-year cohort demonstrated significant improvement in 6-month Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement - Information System Physical Function, 6-week to 1-year VAS back, 6-week VAS leg, and 6-month OW. The <1-year cohort had higher MCID attainment rates in 1-year VAS back/leg. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of symptom duration, patients reported significant improvement in back pain at all postoperative periods. Patients presenting with shorter symptom duration consistently reported significant improvement in leg pain postoperatively. Patients with shorter symptom duration demonstrated greater MCID achievement in back and leg pain. Patients indicated for outpatient MIS-TLIF may benefit more from earlier intervention following onset of symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:E599 / E606
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of Early Depressive Burden on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Wolf, Jacob C.
    Anwar, Fatima N.
    Roca, Andrea M.
    Loya, Alexandra C.
    Medakkar, Srinath S.
    Kaul, Aayush
    Khosla, Ishan
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Nie, James W.
    Macgregor, Keith R.
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Federico, Vincent P.
    Sayari, Arash J.
    Lopez, Gregory D.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2025, 38 (02): : 51 - 57
  • [42] Diabetes Does Not Increase Complications, Length of Stay, or Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Block, Andrew M.
    Lamoutte, Eric H.
    Karmarkar, Sailee S.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (07): : E307 - E311
  • [43] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis
    Wang, Yang-Yi
    Chung, Yu-Hsuan
    Huang, Chun-Hsien
    Hu, Ming-Hsien
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [44] Static Versus Expandable Devices Provide Similar Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Patel, Dil V.
    Yoo, Joon S.
    Guntin, Jordan A.
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    Singh, Kern
    HSS JOURNAL, 2020, 16 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [45] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Vazan, Martin
    Gempt, Jens
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Buchmann, Niels
    Ryang, Yu-Mi
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2017, 159 (06) : 1137 - 1146
  • [46] Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Singh, Kern
    Nandyala, Sreeharsha V.
    Marquez-Lara, Alejandro
    Cha, Thomas D.
    Khan, Safdar N.
    Fineberg, Steven J.
    Pelton, Miguel A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (09) : 1118 - 1125
  • [47] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Martin Vazan
    Jens Gempt
    Bernhard Meyer
    Niels Buchmann
    Yu- Mi Ryang
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2017, 159 : 1137 - 1146
  • [48] Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Hu, Xijian
    Yan, Lei
    Jin, Xinjie
    Liu, Haifeng
    Chai, Jing
    Zhao, Bin
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (01) : 295 - 305
  • [49] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Fan Shunwu
    Zhao Xing
    Zhao Fengdong
    Fang Xiangqian
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) : 1615 - 1620
  • [50] Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Lin, Lu
    Liu, Xiao-Qin
    Shi, Lei
    Cheng, Si
    Wang, Zhi-Qiang
    Ge, Qi-Jun
    Gao, Ding-Zhi
    Ismail, Amadou Cheffou
    Ke, Zhen-Yong
    Chu, Lei
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9