Does Preoperative Symptom Duration Impact Clinical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Setting?

被引:5
|
作者
Nie, James W. [1 ]
Hartman, Timothy J. [1 ]
MacGregor, Keith R. [1 ]
Oyetayo, Omolabake O. [1 ]
Zheng, Eileen [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Ambulatory; Inpatient; MCID; MIS-TLIF; Outpatient; PROMs; Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion; ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; SURGERY; PAIN; ASSOCIATION; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.055
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The effect of prolonged symptom duration in patients undergoing ambulatory MIS-TLIF on postoperative clinical outcomes has not been well studied. We aim to compare symptom duration of pain and/or weakness on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing outpatient MIS-TLIF. METHODS: Patients undergoing outpatient MIS-TLIF were gathered in a single-surgeon database. Exclusion criteria were patients missing onset of symptoms, date of surgery, or diagnosis of malignancy, trauma, or infection. Patients were grouped by symptoms <1 year or symptoms >= 1 year. Propensity score matching for demographics was utilized. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated by comparing change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to previously established values. Inferential statistics for demographics, perioperative characteristics, PROMs, and MCID were utilized to compare between groups and/or postoperative improvement. RESULTS: After matching, there were a total of 56 patients, with 30 patients with symptoms <1-year. The <1-year cohort reported significant improvement in all time points in VAS back/leg and 12-week/6-months in ODI. The >= 1-year cohort demonstrated significant improvement in 6-month Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement - Information System Physical Function, 6-week to 1-year VAS back, 6-week VAS leg, and 6-month OW. The <1-year cohort had higher MCID attainment rates in 1-year VAS back/leg. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of symptom duration, patients reported significant improvement in back pain at all postoperative periods. Patients presenting with shorter symptom duration consistently reported significant improvement in leg pain postoperatively. Patients with shorter symptom duration demonstrated greater MCID achievement in back and leg pain. Patients indicated for outpatient MIS-TLIF may benefit more from earlier intervention following onset of symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:E599 / E606
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reduced Acute Care Costs With the ERAS® Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Conventional Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Chang, Hsuan Kan
    Grossman, Jay
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (04) : 827 - 834
  • [32] Impact of Body Mass Index on Postsurgical Outcomes for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Chavez, Frank A.
    DesLaurier, Justin T.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (04) : 595 - 604
  • [33] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-indications and clinical experience
    Hari, Akshay
    Krishna, Murali
    Rajagandhi, Santhosh
    Rajakumar, Deshpande V.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2016, 64 (03) : 444 - 454
  • [34] Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gun Keorochana
    Kitipong Setrkraising
    Patarawan Woratanarat
    Alisara Arirachakaran
    Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
    Neurosurgical Review, 2018, 41 : 755 - 770
  • [35] Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Keorochana, Gun
    Setrkraising, Kitipong
    Woratanarat, Patarawan
    Arirachakaran, Alisara
    Kongtharvonskul, Jatupon
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 41 (03) : 755 - 770
  • [36] Impact of Time to Surgery for Patients Using Workers' Compensation Insurance Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Patel, Saajan D.
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 160 : E421 - E429
  • [37] The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Lawton, C. D.
    Smith, Z. A.
    Barnawi, A.
    Fessler, R. G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 55 (03) : 259 - 264
  • [38] Association of Preoperative Physical Function and Changes in Mental Health After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (06) : 1115 - 1122
  • [39] Improvements in Back and Leg Pain Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Mayo, Benjamin C.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Louie, Philip K.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (05) : 745 - 755
  • [40] Application and thinking of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases
    Gu, Shao
    Li, Haifeng
    Wang, Daxing
    Dai, Xuejun
    Liu, Chengwei
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (06)