Evaluation of children nasal geometry, employing accoustic rhinometry

被引:4
作者
de Paiva, Joao Batista [1 ]
Villalba Freire-Maia, Belini Augusto
Rino Neto, Jose [1 ]
Di Francesco, Renata Cantisani [2 ,3 ]
Voegels, Richard Louis
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Orthodont & Odontopediat Dept, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Otorhinolaryngol Discipline, Sch Med, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Pediat Otorhinolaryngol Unit, Clin Hosp, Sch Med, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
acoustic; rhinometry; nasal cavity; CROSS-SECTIONAL AREAS; ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY; AGE; GROWTH; GENDER; SCANS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1590/S1808-86942010000300014
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
The area above the nasal cavity plays a role in respiratory physiology. Aim: To analyze, during a period of growth, a possible change in the minimum cross sectional area (MCA) and nasal volume of the anterior nasal cavity. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 29 children (14 boys and 15 girls) with a mean age of 7.81 years at first examination (M1) and 11.27 years in the second examination (M2), without symptoms of nasal obstruction. The interval between examinations was 36-48 months. Children were subjected to the examination of acoustic rhinometry in which we recorded the minimum cross-sectional areas, volumes and their correlations with gender. Study design: Cohort. Results: The mean cross-sectional area of the nasal cavity of MCA for girls was 0.30 +/- 0.09 cm2 (M1) and 0.30 +/- 0.14 cm2 (M2), while for boys was 0.24 +/- 0.12 cm2 (M1) and 0.32 +/- 0.10 cm2 (M2). The mean values of the total volumes found for the whole sample were 2.17 +/- 0.23 cm3 (MCA1-M1), 2.56 +/- 0.27 cm3 (MCA1-M2), 4.24 +/- 1.17 cm3 (MCA2-M2) and 4.63 +/- 1.10 cm3 (MCA2-M2). Conclusion: There was no significant change in the minimum cross sectional area of the anterior nasal cavity. There was no significant difference between genders for both MCA and for the volume. There was a significant increase in MCA1.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 362
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Carlini D, 1999, THESIS ESCOLA PAULIS
[2]   Normative standards for nasal cross-sectional areas by race as measured by acoustic rhinometry [J].
Corey, JP ;
Gungor, A ;
Nelson, R ;
Liu, XL ;
Fredberg, J .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1998, 119 (04) :389-393
[3]   A comparison of the nasal cross-sectional areas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Corey, JP ;
Gungor, A ;
Nelson, R ;
Fredberg, J ;
Lai, V .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1997, 117 (04) :349-354
[4]  
Crouse U, 1999, ANGLE ORTHOD, V69, P413
[5]   TEMPORAL VARIATION IN NASAL AND ORAL BREATHING IN CHILDREN [J].
ELLINGSEN, R ;
VANDEVANTER, C ;
SHAPIRO, P ;
SHAPIRO, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 107 (04) :411-417
[6]  
FONSECA MJ, 2003, ARQ OTORRINOLARINGOL, V7, P213
[7]  
HANDELMAN CS, 1976, ANGLE ORTHOD, V46, P243
[8]   PRIMATE EXPERIMENTS ON ORAL SENSATION AND DENTAL MALOCCLUSIONS [J].
HARVOLD, EP ;
VARGERVIK, K ;
CHIERICI, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1973, 63 (05) :494-508
[9]   ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY - EVALUATION OF NASAL CAVITY GEOMETRY BY ACOUSTIC REFLECTION [J].
HILBERG, O ;
JACKSON, AC ;
SWIFT, DL ;
PEDERSEN, OF .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 66 (01) :295-303
[10]   Nasorespiratory function and head posture [J].
Huggare, JAV ;
LaineAlava, MT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1997, 112 (05) :507-511