The impact of obstetric risk factors and socioeconomic characteristics on utilization of antenatal care

被引:3
作者
Berglund, A [1 ]
Lindmark, G
机构
[1] Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, SE-72189 Vasteras, Sweden
[2] Akad Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE | 1998年 / 20卷 / 04期
关键词
antenatal care; risk factors; utilization of care;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024802
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The objective of the study is to assess the impact of obstetric risk status and defined risk factors on utilization of antenatal care in a Swedish county. Methods An area-based, population study was carried out with retrospective review of standardized patient records before (n = 2008) and after (n = 1874) the introduction of a reduced schedule for surveillance of pregnancy. For assessment of individual risk factors a multiple regression model is used. Results Overall the number of contacts per pregnancy decreased from 13.2 to 11.4. With the reduced routine programme the difference between low-risk and high-risk women increased from 1.1 to 2.7 visits on average, In the multiple regression model socioeconomic characteristics had little influence on the use of antenatal care. Previous obstetric complications increased compliance to the schedule after the programme change. Complications during current pregnancy were important for the number of extra visits planned by the staff. Self referrals were most influenced by symptoms but in-patient care was influenced by multiple factors. The total explanatory ability of the regression model was low for time of first visit to the antenatal care unit and referrals for ultrasound examinations. Conclusions With a reduced routine programme the surveillance became better apportioned to obstetric risk. Even a combination of medical or obstetric risk factors with socioeconomic characteristics explain only part of the variation in utilization of antenatal care.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 462
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BACKE B, 1991, EVALUERING AV SVANGE
[2]   Health services effects of a reduced routine programme for antenatal care - An area-based study [J].
Berglund, AC ;
Lindmark, GC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1998, 77 (02) :193-199
[3]  
BRYCE R, 1990, CLIN OBSTET GYNAECOL, V4, P77
[4]  
BUEKENS P, 1997, BARRIERS INCENTIVES
[5]   PREGNANT WOMENS AILMENTS AND PSYCHOSOCIAL CONDITIONS [J].
FORDE, R .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1992, 9 (03) :270-273
[6]   Inclusion of psychosocial conditions in clinical practice and the problem of medicalization [J].
Forde, R .
THEORETICAL MEDICINE, 1996, 17 (02) :151-161
[7]  
Hall M., 1985, ANTENATAL CARE ASSES
[8]  
HALL MH, 1980, LANCET, V2, P78
[9]   PRENATAL-CARE IN FINLAND - FROM PRIMARY TO TERTIARY HEALTH-CARE [J].
HEMMINKI, E ;
MALIN, M ;
KOJOAUSTIN, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 1990, 20 (02) :221-232
[10]   BARRIERS TO ADOLESCENT PRENATAL-CARE [J].
KINSMAN, SB ;
SLAP, GB .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1992, 13 (02) :146-154