Kinect and wearable inertial sensors for motor rehabilitation programs at home: state of the art and an experimental comparison

被引:65
作者
Milosevic, Bojan [1 ]
Leardini, Alberto [2 ]
Farella, Elisabetta [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Bruno Kessler FBK, E3DA, Trento, Italy
[2] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Movement Anal Lab, Bologna, Italy
关键词
Motor rehabilitation; Home rehabilitation; wearable inertial sensors; Kinect; MARKERLESS MOTION CAPTURE; XBOX ONE KINECT; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; MICROSOFT KINECT; HUMAN MOVEMENT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; QUANTIFIED SELF; GAIT ANALYSIS; JOINT ANGLES; UPPER-LIMB;
D O I
10.1186/s12938-020-00762-7
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Emerging sensing and communication technologies are contributing to the development of many motor rehabilitation programs outside the standard healthcare facilities. Nowadays, motor rehabilitation exercises can be easily performed and monitored even at home by a variety of motion-tracking systems. These are cheap, reliable, easy-to-use, and allow also remote configuration and control of the rehabilitation programs. The two most promising technologies for home-based motor rehabilitation programs are inertial wearable sensors and video-based motion capture systems. Methods: In this paper, after a thorough review of the relevant literature, an original experimental analysis is reported for two corresponding commercially available solutions, a wearable inertial measurement unit and the Kinect, respectively. For the former, a number of different algorithms for rigid body pose estimation from sensor data were also tested. Both systems were compared with the measurements obtained with state-of-the-art marker-based stereophotogrammetric motion analysis, taken as a gold-standard, and also evaluated outside the lab in a home environment. Results: The results in the laboratory setting showed similarly good performance for the elementary large motion exercises, with both systems having errors in the 3-8 degree range. Usability and other possible limitations were also assessed during utilization at home, which revealed additional advantages and drawbacks for the two systems. Conclusions: The two evaluated systems use different technology and algorithms, but have similar performance in terms of human motion tracking. Therefore, both can be adopted for monitoring home-based rehabilitation programs, taking adequate precautions however for operation, user instructions and interpretation of the results.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]   Toward Automatic Activity Classification and Movement Assessment During a Sports Training Session [J].
Ahmadi, Amin ;
Mitchell, Edmond ;
Richter, Chris ;
Destelle, Francois ;
Gowing, Marc ;
O'Connor, Noel E. ;
Moran, Kieran .
IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2015, 2 (01) :23-32
[2]   Estimating Energy Expenditure Using Body-Worn Accelerometers: A Comparison of Methods, Sensors Number and Positioning [J].
Altini, Marco ;
Penders, Julien ;
Vullers, Ruud ;
Amft, Oliver .
IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2015, 19 (01) :219-226
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Tech. Rep.
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, P 2015 WORKSH WEAR S
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Aided Navigation: GPS with High Rate Sensors
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Body Sensor Networks
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INT C WEAR IMPL BOD, DOI DOI 10.1109/BSN.2013.6575466
[8]   Evaluation of Accelerometer-Based Fall Detection Algorithms on Real-World Falls [J].
Bagala, Fabio ;
Becker, Clemens ;
Cappello, Angelo ;
Chiari, Lorenzo ;
Aminian, Kamiar ;
Hausdorff, Jeffrey M. ;
Zijlstra, Wiebren ;
Klenk, Jochen .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05)
[9]   Data Mining for Wearable Sensors in Health Monitoring Systems: A Review of Recent Trends and Challenges [J].
Banaee, Hadi ;
Ahmed, Mobyen Uddin ;
Loutfi, Amy .
SENSORS, 2013, 13 (12) :17472-17500
[10]   Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks [J].
Bergamini, Elena ;
Ligorio, Gabriele ;
Summa, Aurora ;
Vannozzi, Giuseppe ;
Cappozzo, Aurelio ;
Sabatini, Angelo Maria .
SENSORS, 2014, 14 (10) :18625-18649