Remarriage of women and men after divorce - The role of socioeconomic prospects

被引:57
作者
Sweeney, MM
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1177/019251397018005002
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This analysis of remarriage among the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study's cohort of high school graduates investigates the relationship between socioeconomic prospects and remarriage after divorce. This article expands on previous efforts by including multiple measures of socioeconomic prospects and considering their importance over an extended time frame. In addition, a comparative approach is taken in this analysis, with the importance of socioeconomic prospects considered for the remarriage of both women and men. Several competing hypotheses are tested, with results indicating that, for women, the appropriate model of remarriage varies with age of separation from the first husband. With few exceptions, socioeconomic prospects are not found to be related to the remarriage of men. The implications of these findings for patterns of poverty among divorced women are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 502
页数:24
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, AM FAMILIES HOUSEHOL
[2]  
Becker Gary, 1981, A Treatise on the Family
[3]   ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF MARITAL INSTABILITY [J].
BECKER, GS ;
LANDES, EM ;
MICHAEL, RT .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1977, 85 (06) :1141-1187
[4]  
Bianchi S. M., 1986, AM WOMEN TRANSITION
[5]   CHANGING PATTERNS OF REMARRIAGE [J].
BUMPASS, L ;
SWEET, J ;
MARTIN, TC .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1990, 52 (03) :747-756
[6]   THE IMPACT OF FAMILY BACKGROUND AND EARLY MARITAL FACTORS ON MARITAL DISRUPTION [J].
BUMPASS, LL ;
MARTIN, TC ;
SWEET, JA .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES, 1991, 12 (01) :22-42
[7]   NATIONAL ESTIMATES OF COHABITATION [J].
BUMPASS, LL ;
SWEET, JA .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1989, 26 (04) :615-625
[8]   REMARRIAGE AS AN INCOMPLETE INSTITUTION [J].
CHERLIN, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1978, 84 (03) :634-650
[9]   POSTPONING MARRIAGE - THE INFLUENCE OF YOUNG WOMENS WORK EXPECTATIONS [J].
CHERLIN, A .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1980, 42 (02) :355-365
[10]  
Chiswick C U, 1990, J Popul Econ, V3, P193, DOI 10.1007/BF00163075