Assessing competence in cochlear implant surgery using the newly developed Cochlear Implant Surgery Assessment Tool

被引:11
|
作者
Frendo, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Frithioff, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Konge, Lars [2 ]
Foghsgaard, Soren [1 ]
Mikkelsen, Peter Trier [3 ]
Sorensen, Mads Solvsten [1 ]
Caye-Thomasen, Per [1 ]
Andersen, Steven Arild Wuyts [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg & Audiol, 9 Blegdamsvej, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Acad Med Educ & Simulat CAMES, Simulat Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Alexandra Inst, Visual Comp Lab, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Cochlear implants; Medical education; Resident education; Virtual reality; GENERALIZABILITY THEORY; SIMULATION; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; SKILLS; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-021-06632-9
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose To develop and gather validity evidence for a novel tool for assessment of cochlear implant (CI) surgery, including virtual reality CI surgery training. Methods Prospective study gathering validity evidence according to Messick's framework. Four experts developed the CI Surgery Assessment Tool (CISAT). A total of 35 true novices (medical students), trained novices (residents) and CI surgeons performed two CI-procedures each in the Visible Ear Simulator, which were rated by three blinded experts. Classical test theory and generalizability theory were used for reliability analysis. Results The CISAT significantly discriminated between the three groups (p < 0.001). The generalizability coefficient was 0.76 and most of the score variance (53.3%) was attributable to the participant and only 6.8% to the raters. When exploring a standard setting for CI surgery, the contrasting groups method suggested a pass/fail score of 36.0 points (out of 55), but since the trained novices performed above this, we propose using the mean CI surgeon performance score (45.3 points). Conclusion Validity evidence for simulation-based assessment of CI performance supports the CISAT. Together with the standard setting, the CISAT might be used to monitor progress in competency-based training of CI surgery and to determine when the trainee can advance to further training.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 136
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cochlear implant in postlingual children: functional results 10 years after the surgery
    Tanamati, Liege Franzini
    Bevilacqua, Maria Cecilia
    Costa, Orozimbo Alves
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 78 (02) : 103 - 110
  • [22] A Systematic Review of the Clinical Effectiveness of Cochlear Implant Surgery in Pediatric and Adult Patients
    Musleh, A.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 27 (07) : 807 - 818
  • [23] A New Manual Insertion Tool for Minimally Invasive, Image-Guided Cochlear Implant Surgery
    Riojas, Katherine E.
    Narasimhan, Narendran
    Morrel, William G.
    Mitchell, Jason
    Bruns, Trevor
    Webster, Robert J., III
    Labadie, Robert F.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2019, 10951
  • [24] Predicting Acoustic Hearing Preservation Following Cochlear Implant Surgery Using Machine Learning
    Zeitler, Daniel M.
    Buchlak, Quinlan D.
    Ramasundara, Savindi
    Farrokhi, Farrokh
    Esmaili, Nazanin
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (02) : 926 - 936
  • [25] Minimally Traumatic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Expert Opinion in 2010 and 2020
    Topsakal, Vedat
    Agrawal, Sumit
    Atlas, Marcus
    Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter
    Brown, Kevin
    Bruce, Iain A.
    Dazert, Stefan
    Hagen, Rudolf
    Lassaletta, Luis
    Mlynski, Robert
    Raine, Christopher H.
    Rajan, Gunesh P.
    Schmutzhard, Joachim
    Sprinzl, Georg Mathias
    Staecker, Hinrich
    Usami, Shin-ichi
    Van Rompaey, Vincent
    Zernotti, Mario
    van de Heyning, Paul
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [26] Numerical Study of Facial Nerve Stimulation After Cochlear Implant Surgery
    Sadrach, Junaid
    van Rienen, Ursula
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (APEMC 2021), 2021,
  • [27] Revision cochlear implant surgery in adult patients with suspected device malfunction
    Buchman, CA
    Higgins, CA
    Cullen, R
    Pillsbury, HC
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2004, 25 (04) : 504 - 510
  • [28] Distances between the cochlea and adjacent structures related to cochlear implant surgery
    Wysocki, J
    Skarzynski, H
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 1998, 20 (04) : 267 - 271
  • [29] Semilongitudinal and axial CT planes in assessing cochlear patency in cochlear implant candidates
    Bettman, RHR
    Graamans, K
    van Olphen, AF
    Zonneveld, FW
    Huizing, EH
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2004, 31 (02) : 119 - 124
  • [30] MRI versus CT in assessment of cochlear patency in cochlear implant candidates
    Bettman, R
    Beek, E
    Van Olphen, A
    Zonneveld, F
    Huizing, E
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2004, 124 (05) : 577 - 581