Building Transparency and Trustworthiness in Inductive Research Through Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software

被引:91
作者
O'Kane, Paula [1 ]
Smith, Anne [2 ,3 ]
Lerman, Michael P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, HRM, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Univ Tennessee, Haslam Coll Business, Business, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Haslam Coll Business, Dept Management, Knoxville, TN USA
[4] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA USA
关键词
inductive research; text coding; Computer Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS); NVivo; QDA Miner; MANAGEMENT; SENSEMAKING; STRATEGIES; MODEL; QDAS;
D O I
10.1177/1094428119865016
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Many scholars have called for qualitative research to demonstrate transparency and trustworthiness in the data analysis process. Yet these processes, particularly within inductive research, often remain shrouded in mystery. We suggest that computer-aided/assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) can support qualitative researchers in their efforts to present their analysis and findings in a transparent way, thus enhancing trustworthiness. To this end, we propose, describe, and illustrate working examples of six CAQDAS building blocks, three combined CAQDAS techniques, and two coder consistency checks. We argue that these techniques give researchers the language to write about their methods and findings in a transparent manner and that their appropriate use enhances a research project's trustworthiness. Specific CAQDAS techniques are rarely discussed across an array of inductive research processes. Thus, we see this article as the beginning of a conversation about the utility of CAQDAS to support inductive qualitative research.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 139
页数:36
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET? ENHANCING METHODOLOGICAL TRANSPARENCY IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Ramani, Ravi S. ;
Alabduljader, Nawaf .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2018, 12 (01) :83-110
[2]   Science's reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Cascio, Wayne F. ;
Ramani, Ravi S. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2017, 48 (06) :653-663
[3]  
Alvesson M., 2011, Qualitative research and theory development: Mystery as method
[4]  
Bazeley P., 2013, Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies
[5]   The Transparency Paradox: A Role for Privacy in Organizational Learning and Operational Control [J].
Bernstein, Ethan S. .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2012, 57 (02) :181-216
[6]   Greening Remote SMEs: The Case of Small Regional Airports [J].
Boiral, Olivier ;
Ebrahimi, Mehran ;
Kuyken, Kerstin ;
Talbot, David .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2019, 154 (03) :813-827
[7]   Managing Biodiversity Through Stakeholder Involvement: Why, Who, and for What Initiatives? [J].
Boiral, Olivier ;
Heras-Saizarbitoria, Inaki .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 140 (03) :403-421
[8]  
Boyatzis R. E., 1998, TRANSFORMING QUALITA
[9]   Using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software to develop a grounded theory project [J].
Bringer, Joy D. ;
Johnston, Lynne Halley ;
Brackenridge, Celia H. .
FIELD METHODS, 2006, 18 (03) :245-266
[10]   Performance Management: A Scoping Review of the Literature and an Agenda for Future Research [J].
Brown, Travor C. ;
O'Kane, Paula ;
Mazumdar, Bishakha ;
McCracken, Martin .
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2019, 18 (01) :47-82