Uncertainty and Fuzzy Decisions in Earthquake Risk Evaluation of Buildings

被引:29
作者
Ketsap, Akkachai [1 ]
Hansapinyo, Chayanon [2 ]
Kronprasert, Nopadon [3 ]
Limkatanyu, Suchart [4 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Ctr Excellence Nat Disaster Management, Dept Civil Engn, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Excellence Ctr Infrastruct Technol & Transportat, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[4] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Hat Yai, Thailand
来源
ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND | 2019年 / 23卷 / 05期
关键词
Fuzzy logic; retrofit prioritization; seismic risk assessment;
D O I
10.4186/ej.2019.23.5.89
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Northern region of Thailand has been considered as one of the seismic risk zones. However, most existing buildings in the area had been designed and constructed based on old building design codes without seismic consideration. Therefore, those buildings are required to upgrade based on earthquake building damage risk evaluation. With resource limitations, it is not feasible to retrofit all buildings in a short period. In addition, the results of the risk evaluation contain uncertain inputs and outputs. The objective of this study is to prioritize building retrofit based on fuzzy earthquake risk assessment. The risk assessment of a building was made considering the risk factors including (1) building vulnerability, (2) seismic intensity and (3) building values. Then, the total risk was calculated by integrating all the risk factors with their uncertainties using a fuzzy rule based model. An example of the retrofit prioritization is shown here considering the three fuzzy factors. The ranking is hospital, temple, school, government building, factory and house, respectively. The result helps decision makers to screen and prioritize the building retrofitting in the seismically prone area.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 105
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Balassanian S., 2000, Earthquake Hazard and Seismic Risk Reduction
[2]  
Boutaraa Z., 2018, KSCE J CIV ENG, V22, P1
[3]  
BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council), 2000, FEMA-356
[4]  
Coburn A., 2011, EARTHQUAKE PROTECTIO
[5]   Multicriteria Fuzzy Analysis for a GIS-Based Management of Earthquake Scenarios [J].
D'Urso, Maria Grazia ;
Masi, Daniele ;
Zuccaro, Giulio ;
De Gregorio, Daniela .
COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2018, 33 (02) :165-179
[6]   Earthquake risk assessment of building structures [J].
Ellingwood, BR .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 74 (03) :251-262
[7]   Earthquake risk assessment [J].
Erdik, Mustafa .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2017, 15 (12) :5055-5092
[8]  
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2015, P154 FEMA ATC
[9]  
FEMA H., 2003, Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model
[10]  
He H, 2013, MATH PROBL ENG, V2013, P1