Measures of fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with, complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions: A systematic review of measure quality

被引:121
作者
Walton, Holly [1 ]
Spector, Aimee [1 ]
Tombor, Ildiko [2 ]
Michie, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
[2] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
fidelity of delivery; engagement; measures; quality; psychometric; implementation; complex intervention; health; behaviour change; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PRIMARY-CARE; SELF-MANAGEMENT; OLDER-ADULTS; IMPLEMENTATION FIDELITY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; SEDENTARY BEHAVIOR; SMOKING-CESSATION; EDUCATION-PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1111/bjhp.12260
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
PurposeUnderstanding the effectiveness of complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions requires high-quality measures to assess fidelity of delivery and engagement. This systematic review aimed to (1) identify the types of measures used to monitor fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with, complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions and (2) describe the reporting of psychometric and implementation qualities. MethodsElectronic databases were searched, systematic reviews and reference lists were hand-searched, and 21 experts were contacted to identify articles. Studies that quantitatively measured fidelity of delivery of, and/or engagement with, a complex, face-to-face health behaviour change intervention for adults were included. Data on interventions, measures, and psychometric and implementation qualities were extracted and synthesized using narrative analysis. ResultsSixty-six studies were included: 24 measured both fidelity of delivery and engagement, 20 measured fidelity of delivery, and 22 measured engagement. Measures of fidelity of delivery included observation (n=17; 38.6%), self-report (n=15; 34%), quantitatively rated qualitative interviews (n=1; 2.3%), or multiple measures (n=11; 25%). Measures of engagement included self-report (n=18; 39.1%), intervention records (n=11; 24%), or multiple measures (n=17; 37%). Fifty-one studies (77%) reported at least one psychometric or implementation quality; 49 studies (74.2%) reported at least one psychometric quality, and 17 studies (25.8%) reported at least one implementation quality. ConclusionFewer than half of the reviewed studies measured both fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions. More studies reported psychometric qualities than implementation qualities. Interpretation of intervention outcomes from fidelity of delivery and engagement measurements may be limited due to a lack of reporting of psychometric and implementation qualities.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 903
页数:32
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]   Engagement processes in model programs for community reentry from prison for people with serious mental illness [J].
Angell, Beth ;
Matthews, Elizabeth ;
Barrenger, Stacey ;
Watson, Amy C. ;
Draine, Jeffrey .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 37 (05) :490-500
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Constitution of WHO: principles
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MANUAL MOTIVAT UNPUB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Systematic reviews: CRD's guidancefor undertaking reviews in health care
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Prim Healthc Res Dev, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1463423610000228
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[8]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[9]  
[Anonymous], TEMPL INT STUD
[10]  
[Anonymous], GUIDANCE CONDUCT NAR