Patterns of Iranian co-authorship networks in social sciences: A comparative study

被引:13
作者
Nikzad, Mahsa [1 ]
Jamali, Hamid R. [2 ]
Hariri, Nadjla [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, LIS Dept, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] Tarbiat Moallem Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Studies, Fac Psychol & Educ, Tehran, Iran
关键词
SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; CITATION RATES; IMPACT; QUALITY; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.lisr.2011.01.005
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Collaboration in science is a process in which two or more authors share their ideas, resources and data to create a joint work. This research compares coauthorship networks of Iranian articles in library and information science (LIS), psychology (PSY), management (MNG), and economics (ECO) in the ISI Web of Knowledge database during 2000-2009, and uses network analysis for the visualization of coauthorship networks. Data include all articles with at least one Iranian author and indexed in ISI's Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) for the fields of US, PSY, MNG, and ECO. Indicators such as the Collaborative Index (CI), Degree of Collaboration (DC) and Collaboration Coefficient (CC) were calculated for each discipline. Results show that two or three authors were the most common number of authors per paper, and authors of PSY tended to have more multi-authored articles, compared to the other disciplines. LIS had the lowest rank regarding CC. MNG had the densest coauthorship network. and PSY had the sparsest. Iranian authors in the field of PSY mostly collaborated with those in the U.S.. while LIS and MNG authors tended to collaborate with U.K. authors, and ECO authors tended to collaborate with Canadians. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 319
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis [J].
Acedo, Francisco Jose ;
Barroso, Carmen ;
Casanueva, Cristobal ;
Galan, Jose Luis .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (05) :957-983
[2]   COLLABORATIVE COEFFICIENT - A SINGLE MEASURE OF THE DEGREE OF COLLABORATION IN RESEARCH [J].
AJIFERUKE, I ;
BURELL, Q ;
TAGUE, J .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1988, 14 (5-6) :421-433
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Science and Public Policy, DOI [DOI 10.1093/SPP/23.1.39, 10.1093/spp/23.1.39]
[4]   Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research [J].
Avkiran, NK .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1997, 39 (02) :173-184
[5]  
Batagelj V., 2009, Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis
[6]   STUDIES IN SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION .3. PROFESSIONALIZATION AND THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF MODERN SCIENTIFIC CO-AUTHORSHIP [J].
BEAVER, DD ;
ROSEN, R .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1979, 1 (03) :231-245
[7]   THE QUALITY OF SINGLE AND MULTIPLE AUTHORED PAPERS - AN UNRESOLVED PROBLEM [J].
BRIDGSTOCK, M .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1991, 21 (01) :37-48
[8]   MULTIPLE AUTHORSHIP TRENDS IN SCIENTIFIC PAPERS [J].
CLARKE, BL .
SCIENCE, 1964, 143 (360) :822-&
[9]  
De Nooy W., 2005, EXPLORATORY NETWORK
[10]   Scientific collaboration results in higher citation rates of published articles [J].
Figg, WD ;
Dunn, L ;
Liewehr, DJ ;
Steinberg, SM ;
Thurman, PW ;
Barrett, JC ;
Birkinshaw, J .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2006, 26 (06) :759-767