Comparative evaluation of ATB Fungus 2 and Sensititre YeastOne panels for testing in vitro Candida antifungal susceptibility

被引:14
作者
Eraso, Elena [1 ]
Ruesga, Maite [1 ]
Villar-Vidal, Maria [1 ]
Javier Carrillo-Munoz, Alfonso [2 ]
Espinel-Ingroff, Ana [3 ]
Quindos, Guillermo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, Lab Micol Med, Dept Inmunol Microbiol & Parasitol, Fac Med & Odontol, E-48080 Bilbao, Spain
[2] ACIA, Dept Microbiol, E-08010 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Ctr, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
来源
REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE MICOLOGIA | 2008年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
ATB fungus 2; Sensititre YeastOne; in vitro antifungal susceptibility; Candida;
D O I
10.1016/S1130-1406(08)70002-0
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
ATB Fungus 2 and Sensititre YeastOne are commercial methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. The agreement between these two methods was assessed with a total of 133 Candida strains (60 Candida albicans, 18 Candida dubliniensis, 29 Candida glabrata, and 26 Candida krusel). MIC endpoints were established after 24 h of incubation at 36 +/- 1 degrees C by each method. Intra-laboratory reproducibility of both methods was excellent (>= 99%). Overall agreement between ATB Fungus 2 and Sensititre YeastOne 3 MICs (within 2 dilutions) was 91.2-97.7% for amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine and itraconazole, and 82.7% for fluconazole. The categorical agreement when ATB Fungus 2 results were compared to those by Sensititre YeastOne 3 was 93.2-98.5% for 5-fluorocytosine and amphotericin B, but lower for the triazoles (72.9-75.9%). This easy to perform method could be an alternative for routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory for susceptibility testing of common Candida spp.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 6
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Baires-Varguez Laura, 2007, Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia, V24, P148
[2]  
Durussel C, 2004, CLIN MICROBIOL INFEC, V10, P112
[3]   Correlation of Neo-Sensitabs tablet diffusion assay results on three different agar media with CLSI broth microdilution M27-A2 and disk diffusion M44-A results for testing susceptibilities of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neofonnans to amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazolev [J].
Espinel-Ingroff, A. ;
Canton, E. ;
Gibbs, D. ;
Wang, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (03) :858-864
[4]   Comparison of three commercial assays and a modified disk diffusion assay with two broth microdilution reference assays for testing Zygomycetes, Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., and Cryptococcus neoformans with posaconazole and Amphotericin B [J].
Espinel-Ingroff, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (10) :3616-3622
[5]   Multicenter comparison of the sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal Panel with the NCCLS M27-A2 reference method for testing new antifungal agents against clinical isolates of Candida spp. [J].
Espinel-Ingroff, A ;
Pfaller, M ;
Messer, SA ;
Knapp, CC ;
Holliday, N ;
Killian, SB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (02) :718-721
[6]   International and multicenter comparison of EUCAST and CLSI M27-A2 broth microdilution methods for testing susceptibilities of Candida spp. to fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole [J].
Espinel-Ingroff, A ;
Barchiesi, F ;
Cuenca-Estrella, M ;
Pfaller, MA ;
Rinaldi, M ;
Rodriguez-Tudela, JL ;
Verweij, PE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (08) :3884-3889
[7]  
Gutiérrez J, 2002, J BASIC MICROB, V42, P207, DOI 10.1002/1521-4028(200206)42:3&lt
[8]  
207::AID-JOBM207&gt
[9]  
3.0.CO
[10]  
2-C