Distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer: in vivo MR imaging compared with histopathological examination. Initial observations

被引:52
作者
Koh, DM [1 ]
Brown, G [1 ]
Temple, L [1 ]
Blake, H [1 ]
Raja, A [1 ]
Toomey, P [1 ]
Bett, N [1 ]
Farhat, S [1 ]
Norman, AR [1 ]
Daniels, I [1 ]
Husband, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Inst Canc Res, Canc Res UK Magnet Resonance Grp, Acad Dept Radiol, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
关键词
rectum; cancer; magnetic resonance; lymph node; histopathology;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-005-2751-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this work was to determine the distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes using T-2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging compared with histopathological findings in patients with rectal carcinoma. Sixteen patients with rectal carcinoma undergoing primary surgery without pre-operative neoadjuvant treatment were evaluated using 3-mm axial T-2-weighted MR imaging. The position of each visible mesorectal node on imaging was localised by measuring its minimum distance from the mesorectal fascia (d(m)), its minimum distance from the rectal wall (d(r)) and its distance from the distal tumour margin (d(v)). Independent assessment of d(m), d(r) and d(v) was made at histopathological examination. Eighty-five mesorectal nodes on in vivo MR imaging were matched to histopathological findings. On imaging, 67/85 mesorectal nodes were found at the level of the tumour and 84/85 were identified at or within 5 cm proximal to the tumour. Only one out of 85 nodes was seen below the inferior tumour margin. The mean difference of d(m) and d(r) obtained on in vivo MR imaging and histopathological examination was 0.7 mm (95% confidence interval, CI, -0.12 to 1.42 mm) and -1.1 mm (95% CI -2.29 to 0.14 mm), respectively. Almost all mesorectal nodes visible on MR imaging were found at the level of tumour or within 5 cm proximal to the tumour. This has implications for the planning of MR imaging and the level of mesorectal transection at surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1650 / 1657
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Thin-section MRI with a phased-array coil for preoperative evaluation of pelvic anatomy and tumor extent in patients with rectal cancer [J].
Akasu, T ;
Iinuma, G ;
Fujita, T ;
Muramatsu, Y ;
Tateishi, U ;
Miyakawa, K ;
Murakami, T ;
Moriyama, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (02) :531-538
[2]   Adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum surgically treated with a <10-MM distal clearance:: Preliminary results in 35 N0 patients [J].
Andreola, S ;
Leo, E ;
Belli, F ;
Bonfanti, G ;
Sirizzotti, G ;
Greco, P ;
Valvo, F ;
Tomasic, G ;
Gallino, GF .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 8 (07) :611-615
[3]   Rectal cancer: Review with emphasis on MR imaging [J].
Beets-Tan, RGH ;
Beets, GL .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (02) :335-346
[4]   Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery [J].
Beets-Tan, RGH ;
Beets, GL ;
Vliegen, RFA ;
Kessels, AGH ;
Van Boven, H ;
De Bruine, A ;
von Meyenfeldt, MF ;
Baeten, CGMI ;
van Engelshoven, JMA .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9255) :497-504
[5]   Preoperative assessment of local tumor extent in advanced rectal cancer: CT or high-resolution MRI? [J].
Beets-Tan, RGH ;
Beets, GL ;
Borstlap, ACW ;
Oei, TK ;
Teune, TM ;
von Meyenfeldt, MF ;
van Engelshoven, JMA .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2000, 25 (05) :533-541
[6]   Identification of the fascia propria by magnetic resonance imaging and its relevance to preoperative assessment of rectal cancer [J].
Bissett, IP ;
Fernando, CC ;
Hough, DM ;
Cowan, BR ;
Chau, KY ;
Young, AA ;
Parry, BR ;
Hill, GL .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (02) :259-265
[7]   Rectal tumour staging: MR imaging using pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils vs endoscopic ultrasonography [J].
Blomqvist, L ;
Machado, M ;
Rubio, C ;
Gabrielsson, N ;
Granqvist, S ;
Goldman, S ;
Holm, T .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (04) :653-660
[8]   Rectal adenocarcinoma: assessment of tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin by MRI of resected specimen [J].
Blomqvist, L ;
Rubio, C ;
Holm, T ;
Machado, M ;
Hindmarsh, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 72 (853) :18-23
[9]   Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging? [J].
Brown, G ;
Davies, S ;
Williams, GT ;
Bourne, MW ;
Newcombe, RG ;
Radcliffe, AG ;
Blethyn, J ;
Dallimore, NS ;
Rees, BI ;
Phillips, CJ ;
Maughan, TS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (01) :23-29
[10]   Rectal carcinoma: Thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients [J].
Brown, G ;
Richards, CJ ;
Newcombe, RG ;
Dallimore, NS ;
Radcliffe, AG ;
Carey, DP ;
Bourne, MW ;
Williams, GT .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) :215-222