Debriefing after simulation-based non-technical skill training in healthcare: a systematic review of effective practice

被引:83
作者
Garden, A. L. [1 ,2 ]
Le Fevre, D. M. [3 ]
Waddington, H. L. [4 ]
Weller, J. M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Wellington Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Cent NZ Rotat Anaesthet Training Scheme, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Victoria Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Univ Auckland, Sch Teaching Learning & Dev, Educ, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[4] Wellington Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Wellington, New Zealand
[5] Univ Auckland, Ctr Med & Hlth Sci Educ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland 1, New Zealand
关键词
simulation; debrief; after action review; feedback; education; HIGH-FIDELITY SIMULATION; RESUSCITATION PERFORMANCE; TEAM; MANAGEMENT; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1177/0310057X1504300303
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Non-technical skills training in healthcare frequently uses high-fidelity simulation followed by a facilitated discussion known as debriefing. This type of training is mandatory for anaesthesia training in Australia and New Zealand. Debriefing by a skilled facilitator is thought to be essential for new learning through feedback and reflective processes. Key elements of effective debriefing need to be clearly identified to ensure that the training is evidence-based. We undertook a systematic review of empirical studies where elements of debriefing have been systematically manipulated during non-technical skills training. Eight publications met the inclusion criteria, but seven of these were of limited generalisability. The only study that was generalisable found that debriefing by novice instructors using a script improved team leader performance in paediatric resuscitation. The remaining seven publications were limited by the small number of debriefers included in each study and these reports were thus analogous to case reports. Generally, performance improved after debriefing by a skilled facilitator. However, the debriefer provided no specific advantage over other post-experience educational interventions. Acknowledging their limitations, these studies found that performance improved after self-led debrief, no debrief (with experienced practitioners), standardised multimedia debrief or after reviewing a DVD of the participants' own eye-tracking. There was no added performance improvement when review of a video recording was added to facilitator-led debriefing. One study reported no performance improvement after debriefing. Without empirical evidence that is specific to the healthcare domain, theories of learning from education and psychology should continue to inform practices and teaching for effective debriefing.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 308
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Argyris C, 1985, STRATEGY CHANGE DEFE, P1
[2]   Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing Bringing Science to the Art of Debriefing in Surgery [J].
Arora, Sonal ;
Ahmed, Maria ;
Paige, John ;
Nestel, Debra ;
Runnacles, Jane ;
Hull, Louise ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Sevdalis, Nick .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (06) :982-988
[3]   Within-Team Debriefing Versus Instructor-Led Debriefing for Simulation-Based Education A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Boet, Sylvain ;
Bould, M. Dylan ;
Sharma, Bharat ;
Revees, Scott ;
Naik, Viren N. ;
Triby, Emmanuel ;
Grantcharov, Teodor .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 258 (01) :53-58
[4]   Looking in the mirror: Self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises [J].
Boet, Sylvain ;
Bould, M. Dylan ;
Bruppacher, Heinz R. ;
Desjardins, Francois ;
Chandra, Deven B. ;
Naik, Viren N. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (06) :1377-1381
[5]   Cognitive versus technical debriefing after simulation training [J].
Bond, WF ;
Deitrick, LM ;
Eberhardt, M ;
Barr, GC ;
Kane, BG ;
Worrilow, CC ;
Arnold, DC ;
Croskerry, P .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 13 (03) :276-283
[6]  
Brandrup J., 1999, POLYM HDB, V4th, P1
[7]   Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare Development and Psychometric Properties [J].
Brett-Fleegler, Marisa ;
Rudolph, Jenny ;
Eppich, Walter ;
Monuteaux, Michael ;
Fleegler, Eric ;
Cheng, Adam ;
Simon, Robert .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2012, 7 (05) :288-294
[8]   Simulation-based Training Improves Physicians' Performance in Patient Care in High-stakes Clinical Setting of Cardiac Surgery [J].
Bruppacher, Heinz R. ;
Alam, Syed K. ;
LeBlanc, Vicki R. ;
Latter, David ;
Naik, Viren N. ;
Savoldelli, Georges L. ;
Mazer, C. David ;
Kurrek, Matt M. ;
Joo, Hwan S. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 112 (04) :985-992
[9]  
Bryk AS, 2002, TRUST SCH CORE RESOU, P1
[10]   Assessment instruments used during anaesthetic simulation: review of published studies [J].
Byrne, AJ ;
Greaves, JD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 86 (03) :445-450